Literature DB >> 16484351

Microwave ablation: results with a 2.45-GHz applicator in ex vivo bovine and in vivo porcine liver.

Andrew U Hines-Peralta1, Nadeer Pirani, Peter Clegg, Nigel Cronin, Thomas P Ryan, Zhenjun Liu, S Nahum Goldberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the relationship between applied power and treatment duration in their effect on extent of coagulation produced with a 2.45-GHz microwave applicator in both an ex vivo and a perfused in vivo liver model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All experimentation was approved by the Institute of Animal Care and Use Committee. Multiple tissue ablations were performed in ex vivo bovine liver (120 ablations) and in vivo porcine liver (45 ablations) with a 5.7-mm-diameter 2.45-GHz microwave applicator. The applied power was varied from 50 to 150 W (in 25-W increments ex vivo and 50-W increments in vivo), while treatment duration varied from 2 to 20 minutes (in eight time increments for ex vivo and five for in vivo liver). Three-dimensional contour maps of the resultant short- and long-axis coagulation diameters were constructed to identify the optimal parameters to achieve maximum coagulation in both ex vivo and in vivo models. Multivariate analysis was performed to characterize the relationship between applied power and treatment duration.
RESULTS: Power and treatment duration were both associated with coagulation diameter in a sigmoidal fashion (ex vivo, R(2) = 0.78; in vivo, R(2) = 0.74). For ex vivo liver, the maximum short-axis coagulation diameter (7.6 cm +/- 0.2 [standard deviation] by 12.3 cm +/- 0.8) was achieved at greatest power (150 W) and duration (20 minutes). In vivo studies revealed a sigmoidal relationship between duration and coagulation size, with a relative plateau in coagulation size achieved within 8 minutes duration at all power levels. After 8 minutes of treatment at 150 W, the mean short-axis coagulation diameter for in vivo liver was 5.7 cm +/- 0.2 by 6.5 cm +/- 1.7, which was significantly larger than the corresponding result for ex vivo liver (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Large zones of ablation can be achieved with the 2.45-GHz microwave applicator used by the authors. For higher-power ablations, larger zones of coagulation were achieved for in vivo liver than for ex vivo liver with short energy applications, a finding previously not seen with other ablation devices, to the authors' knowledge. (c) RSNA, 2006.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16484351     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2383050262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  39 in total

1.  Tissue contraction caused by radiofrequency and microwave ablation: a laboratory study in liver and lung.

Authors:  Christopher L Brace; Teresa A Diaz; J Louis Hinshaw; Fred T Lee
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Microwaves create larger ablations than radiofrequency when controlled for power in ex vivo tissue.

Authors:  A Andreano; Yu Huang; M Franca Meloni; Fred T Lee; Christopher Brace
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Thermal ablation for unresectable liver tumours, time to move forward?

Authors:  Gianpiero Gravante
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-01-27

4.  Creation of short microwave ablation zones: in vivo characterization of single and paired modified triaxial antennas.

Authors:  Meghan G Lubner; Tim J Ziemlewicz; J Louis Hinshaw; Fred T Lee; Lisa A Sampson; Christopher L Brace
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  High-powered microwave ablation with a small-gauge, gas-cooled antenna: initial ex vivo and in vivo results.

Authors:  Meghan G Lubner; J Louis Hinshaw; Anita Andreano; Lisa Sampson; Fred T Lee; Christopher L Brace
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Microwave ablation treatment of liver cancer with 2,450-MHz cooled-shaft antenna: an experimental and clinical study.

Authors:  Dechao Jiao; Linxue Qian; Yanling Zhang; Fujun Zhang; Chuanxing Li; Zilin Huang; Liang Zhang; Weidong Zhang; Peihong Wu; Xinwei Han; Guangfeng Duan; Jianjun Han
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Microwave ablation in a hepatic porcine model: correlation of CT and histopathologic findings.

Authors:  Michael M Awad; Lara Devgan; Ihab R Kamel; Michael Torbensen; Michael A Choti
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 8.  Microwave ablation technology: what every user should know.

Authors:  Christopher L Brace
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

Review 9.  Microwave ablation of hepatic malignancy.

Authors:  Meghan G Lubner; Christopher L Brace; Tim J Ziemlewicz; J Louis Hinshaw; Fred T Lee
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 10.  Radiofrequency and microwave ablation of the liver, lung, kidney, and bone: what are the differences?

Authors:  Christopher L Brace
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2009 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.