Literature DB >> 16483658

European multicenter study of the AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens.

Thomas Kohnen1, David Allen, Catherine Boureau, Philippe Dublineau, Christian Hartmann, Ekkehard Mehdorn, Pascal Rozot, Giorgio Tassinari.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the safety and effectiveness of the AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL), model MA60D3, when implanted into the capsular bag.
DESIGN: Multicenter European study including university clinics, eye hospitals, and private ophthalmic surgical centers. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-seven subjects implanted in cataractous eyes in an open multicenter study. INTERVENTION: After phacoemulsification, the foldable 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic apodized diffractive IOL was implanted in the capsular bag using a Monarch injector with an A-cartridge. The mean preoperative patient age was 68.4+/-12 years. Intraocular lens implant power ranged from 18.0 to 25.0 diopters (D) in 0.5-D increments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distance visual acuity (VA), near VA, spectacle dependence, unwanted visual symptoms, and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: At the 6-month postoperative visit, binocular (both eyes simultaneously) mean uncorrected distance and near logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VAs for the MA60D3 were 0.04+/-0.14 and 0.09+/-0.12 (n = 118), respectively. In addition, 88.0% and 84.6% of ReSTOR subjects achieved spectacle independence for distance and near vision, respectively. Glare and halos were reported as severe by only 8.5% and 4.2% of patients, respectively. Ninety-two percent of patients stated that they would choose to have the same lens implanted again after the first implant, and 95.7% answered likewise after the second implant.
CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof ReSTOR MA60D3 IOL demonstrated excellent near VA without compromising distance vision. Spectacle independence and patient satisfaction were high, whereas unwanted photic phenomena were clinically acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16483658     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  40 in total

Review 1.  [Vision with bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses].

Authors:  K Kirschfeld; M F Land
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Apodized diffractive optic. New concept in multifocal lens technology].

Authors:  T Kohnen; V Derhartunian
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Bioptics with multifocal lenses and Lasek].

Authors:  A Liekfeld; L Friederici; P Rieck
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  All-distance visual acuity in eyes with a nontinted or a yellow-tinted diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Miki Masumoto; Hideyuki Hayashi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  [Accommodation and presbyopia : part 2: surgical procedures for the correction of presbyopia].

Authors:  M Baumeister; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Five-year postoperative outcomes of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Mami Yoshino; Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima; Keiichiro Minami; Yoko Taira
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 7.  [Use of multifocal intraocular lenses and criteria for patient selection].

Authors:  T Kohnen; D Kook; G U Auffarth; V Derhartunian
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 8.  [The basics of refractive lens exchange].

Authors:  T Kohnen; O K Klaproth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  [A new toric diffractive multifocal lens for refractive surgery].

Authors:  A Liekfeld; N Torun; L Friederici
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Measuring benefits and patients' satisfaction when glasses are not needed after cataract and presbyopia surgery: scoring and psychometric validation of the Freedom from Glasses Value Scale (FGVS).

Authors:  Gilles Berdeaux; Juliette Meunier; Benoit Arnould; Muriel Viala-Danten
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.