BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major opportunistic agent among transplant recipients. While detection of CMV pp65-lower matrix protein (pp65Ag) is still widely used for monitoring CMV infection, real-time PCR assays have been recently developed for routine quantitation of CMV DNA. However, correlations are lacking between results of pp65Ag and quantitative PCR assays and there is no consensus yet as to the more appropriate blood compartment (whole blood (WB), leukocytes, plasma) to be tested with PCR assays. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to determine, in a population of transplant recipients: (i) the correlation between pp65Ag and CMV quantitative real-time PCR in our setting and (ii) the utility of plasma CMV DNA quantitation in comparison to WB quantitation. METHODS: In 170 blood samples (from 61 solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipients) with pp65Ag results, CMV quantitation was performed in WB and plasma using an in-house real-time quantitative PCR. RESULTS: Real-time PCR and pp65Ag results in WB were correlated: thresholds of 10 and 50(+) cells/200,000 cells were equivalent to 3.3 log(10)copies/mL (2,000 copies/mL) and 3.8 log(10)copies/mL (6,300 copies/mL), respectively. When WB viral load was >or=3.6 log(10)copies/mL, the risk to have a negative plasma CMV DNA result was <or=2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: For the routine exploration of a single compartment, whole blood would represent a suitable compromise: easy processing for a sensitive assay. The 3.6 log(10)copies/mL threshold, which could help in identifying active CMV infection, deserves further evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major opportunistic agent among transplant recipients. While detection of CMV pp65-lower matrix protein (pp65Ag) is still widely used for monitoring CMV infection, real-time PCR assays have been recently developed for routine quantitation of CMV DNA. However, correlations are lacking between results of pp65Ag and quantitative PCR assays and there is no consensus yet as to the more appropriate blood compartment (whole blood (WB), leukocytes, plasma) to be tested with PCR assays. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to determine, in a population of transplant recipients: (i) the correlation between pp65Ag and CMV quantitative real-time PCR in our setting and (ii) the utility of plasma CMV DNA quantitation in comparison to WB quantitation. METHODS: In 170 blood samples (from 61 solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipients) with pp65Ag results, CMV quantitation was performed in WB and plasma using an in-house real-time quantitative PCR. RESULTS: Real-time PCR and pp65Ag results in WB were correlated: thresholds of 10 and 50(+) cells/200,000 cells were equivalent to 3.3 log(10)copies/mL (2,000 copies/mL) and 3.8 log(10)copies/mL (6,300 copies/mL), respectively. When WB viral load was >or=3.6 log(10)copies/mL, the risk to have a negative plasma CMV DNA result was <or=2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: For the routine exploration of a single compartment, whole blood would represent a suitable compromise: easy processing for a sensitive assay. The 3.6 log(10)copies/mL threshold, which could help in identifying active CMV infection, deserves further evaluation.
Authors: Reinhard B Raggam; Michael Bozic; Helmut J F Salzer; Sandra Hammerschmidt; Cordula Homberg; Katharina Ruzicka; Harald H Kessler Journal: Med Microbiol Immunol Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: R Parody; R Martino; R de la Cámara; A García-Noblejas; A Esquirol; I Garcia-Cadenas; T Villaescusa; D Caballero; M Rovira; F Fernandez-Avilés; F J Marquez-Malaver; I Espigado; C Castilla-Llorente; I Heras; M A Cabero; J R Cabrera; P Barba; D Valcarcel; I Sánchez-Ortega; R F Duarte; D Serrano; F Carretero; L Vazquez Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2014-10-27 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Renata M B Peres; Cláudia R C Costa; Paula D Andrade; Sandra H A Bonon; Dulcinéia M Albuquerque; Cristiane de Oliveira; Afonso C Vigorito; Francisco J P Aranha; Cármino A de Souza; Sandra C B Costa Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Birgit D A Michelin; Ita Hadzisejdic; Michael Bozic; Maja Grahovac; Markus Hess; Blazenka Grahovac; Egon Marth; Harald H Kessler Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Giovanni Breda; Bernado Almeida; Suzana Carstensen; Carmem M Bonfim; Meri B Nogueira; Luine R Vidal; Sergio M Almeida; Sonia M Raboni Journal: Pathog Glob Health Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: D C Jones; S Peacock; D Hughes; J A Traherne; R L Allen; M C N M Barnardo; P Friend; C J Taylor; S Fuggle; J Trowsdale; N T Young Journal: Genes Immun Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 2.676