Literature DB >> 32968857

Towards describing scenes by animals: Pigeons' ordinal discrimination of objects varying in depth.

Suzanne L Gray1, Muhammad A J Qadri2, Robert G Cook2.   

Abstract

The perception of a complex scene requires visual mechanisms that include identifying objects and their relative placement in depth. To examine apparent depth perception in birds, we tested four pigeons with a novel multiple-sequential-choice procedure. We created 3D-rendered scene stimuli containing three objects located at different apparent depths based on a variety of pictorial cues and placed small circular target response areas on them. The pigeons were trained to sequentially choose among the multiple response areas to report the object closest in apparent depth (ordinal position; front then middle object). After the pigeons learned this sequential depth discrimination, their use of three different monocular depth cues (occlusion, relative size, height in field) was tested, and their flexibility evaluated using three novel objects. In addition to the contribution to understanding apparent depth perception in birds, the use of more flexible open-ended choice discriminations, as employed here, has considerable promise for creating informative production-like tasks in nonverbal animals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depth perception; Monocular cues; Pigeons; Production tasks; Scene processing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32968857     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-020-00444-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  17 in total

1.  A new learning paradigm elicits fast visual discrimination in pigeons.

Authors:  Ludwig Huber; Wilfried Apfalter; Michael Steurer; Hermann Prossinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-04

2.  The contribution of monocular depth cues to scene perception by pigeons.

Authors:  Brian R Cavoto; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-07

Review 3.  Small-scale spatial cognition in pigeons.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Marcia L Spetch; Debbie M Kelly; Verner P Bingman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Shape from shading in pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Muhammad A J Qadri; Art Kieres; Nicholas Commons-Miller
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-06-29

5.  Nonaccidental properties underlie shape recognition in Mammalian and nonmammalian vision.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Olga F Lazareva; Frédéric Gosselin; Philippe G Schyns; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.

Authors:  A G Greenwald; D E McGhee; J L Schwartz
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-06

7.  Abstract-concept learning of difference in pigeons.

Authors:  Thomas A Daniel; Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli.

Authors:  D C Delis; L C Robertson; R Efron
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  "Insight" in pigeons: absence of means-end processing in displacement tests.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Catherine Fowler
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Visualizing search behavior with adaptive discriminations.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Muhammad A J Qadri
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.