Literature DB >> 16479421

The Aer-O-Scope: proof of the concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope in a pig model.

J Pfeffer1, R Grinshpon, D Rex, B Levin, T Rösch, N Arber, Z Halpern.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Considerable training is needed to enable endoscopists to use the currently available commercial colonoscopes and sigmoidoscopes effectively and safely. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the propulsion mechanism incorporated into the Aer-O-Scope (GI View Ltd., Ramat Gan, Israel)--a novel self-propelled, self-navigating colonic endoscope for diagnostic purposes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty young female pigs underwent complete bowel preparation followed by a sedated examination using the new device. Ten pigs underwent two consecutive procedures, with a wash-out period of 7 days between each procedure. The total number of procedures was 30. Two prototypes of the Aer-O-Scope, with different cable lengths and vehicle balloon sizes (n = 20 and n = 10 for prototypes I and II, respectively) were used. Each examination was followed by a standard colonoscopy for safety evaluation. The insertion length of the Aer-O-Scope was determined by fluoroscopy images.
RESULTS: The colon was adequately clean in 25 procedures. Maximum insertion was achieved in 21 procedures (84%)--80% with prototype I (n = 15) and 90% with prototype II (n = 10). The time to maximum insertion averaged 8.9 +/- 4.4 min (10 +/- 4.6 and 6.6 +/- 2.9 min for prototypes I and II; P < 0.05), and the withdrawal time averaged 3.4 +/- 2.1 and 4.2 +/- 3.4 min, respectively. The driving pressures for prototypes I and II averaged 46.3 and 34.5 mbar, respectively. The follow-up conventional colonoscopy identified no mucosal tears or perforations. Minor mucosal petechiae were noted in 43% of the cases. No adverse events were noted up to 7 days after the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: The propulsion mechanism used in this novel self-propelled, self-navigating colonoscope was effective and safe in pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16479421     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-925089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  12 in total

1.  New endoscopy devices to improve population adherence to colorectal cancer prevention programs.

Authors:  Asimina Gaglia; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07-16

Review 2.  Application of robotics in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review.

Authors:  Baldwin Po Man Yeung; Philip Wai Yan Chiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Optimizing working-space in laparoscopy: measuring the effect of mechanical bowel preparation in a porcine model.

Authors:  John Vlot; Juliette C Slieker; René Wijnen; Johan F Lange; Klaas N M A Bax
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Robotic Endoscopy.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Philip Wai-Yan Chiu
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-02-09

5.  Nonparametric Online Learning Control for Soft Continuum Robot: An Enabling Technique for Effective Endoscopic Navigation.

Authors:  Kit-Hang Lee; Denny K C Fu; Martin C W Leong; Marco Chow; Hing-Choi Fu; Kaspar Althoefer; Kam Yim Sze; Chung-Kwong Yeung; Ka-Wai Kwok
Journal:  Soft Robot       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Robotics in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Dan Cater; Arpita Vyas; Dinesh Vyas
Journal:  Am J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-06

Review 7.  Advanced endoscopic technologies for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  A Soft Robotic Sleeve for Safer Colonoscopy Procedures.

Authors:  Max McCandless; Arincheyan Gerald; Ashlyn Carroll; Hiroyuki Aihara; Sheila Russo
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2021-04-15

9.  A novel colonoscope with panoramic visualization detected more simulated polyps than conventional colonoscopy in a live swine model.

Authors:  Nathan Gluck; Sigal Fishman; Alaa Melhem; Sharon Goldfarb; Zamir Halpern; Erwin Santo
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-10-06

Review 10.  Emerging next-generation robotic colonoscopy systems towards painless colonoscopy.

Authors:  Chung-Kwong Yeung; Jo Lk Cheung; Biji Sreedhar
Journal:  J Dig Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.