Literature DB >> 16478690

Computational chemistry-driven decision making in lead generation.

Volker Schnecke1, Jonas Boström.   

Abstract

Novel starting points for drug discovery projects are generally found either by screening large collections of compounds or smaller more-focused libraries. Ideally, hundreds or even thousands of actives are initially found, and these need to be reduced to a handful of promising lead series. In several sequential steps, many actives are dropped and only some are followed up. Computational chemistry tools are used in this context to predict properties, cluster hits, design focused libraries and search for close analogues to explore the potential of hit series. At the end of hit-to-lead, the project must commit to one, or preferably a few, lead series that will be refined during lead optimization and hopefully produce a drug candidate. Striving for the best possible decision is crucial because choosing the wrong series is a costly one-way street.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16478690     DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03703-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Discov Today        ISSN: 1359-6446            Impact factor:   7.851


  19 in total

Review 1.  Virtual screening: an endless staircase?

Authors:  Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Quantitative high-throughput screening: a titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries.

Authors:  James Inglese; Douglas S Auld; Ajit Jadhav; Ronald L Johnson; Anton Simeonov; Adam Yasgar; Wei Zheng; Christopher P Austin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5.

Authors:  Demetri T Moustakas; P Therese Lang; Scott Pegg; Eric Pettersen; Irwin D Kuntz; Natasja Brooijmans; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  From laptop to benchtop to bedside: structure-based drug design on protein targets.

Authors:  Lu Chen; John K Morrow; Hoang T Tran; Sharangdhar S Phatak; Lei Du-Cuny; Shuxing Zhang
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.116

5.  Indirect similarity based methods for effective scaffold-hopping in chemical compounds.

Authors:  Nikil Wale; Ian A Watson; George Karypis
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 6.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Gregory Sliwoski; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Jens Meiler; Edward W Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 25.468

7.  Lead optimization mapper: automating free energy calculations for lead optimization.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Yujie Wu; Teng Lin; Robert Abel; Jonathan P Redmann; Christopher M Summa; Vivian R Jaber; Nathan M Lim; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Novel Algorithms for the Identification of Biologically Informative Chemical Diversity Metrics.

Authors:  Bhargav Theertham; Jenna L Wang; Jianwen Fang; Gerald H Lushington
Journal:  Curr Comput Aided Drug Des       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 1.606

9.  Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Dehydrogenation of the indoline-containing drug 4-chloro-N-(2-methyl-1-indolinyl)-3-sulfamoylbenzamide (indapamide) by CYP3A4: correlation with in silico predictions.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Chad Moore; Patrick M Dansette; Santosh Kumar; James R Halpert; Garold S Yost
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.922

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.