Literature DB >> 16478669

Biomechanical characterization and in vitro mechanical injury of elderly human femoral head cartilage: comparison to adult bovine humeral head cartilage.

O Démarteau1, L Pillet, A Inaebnit, O Borens, T M Quinn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In vitro mechanical injury of articular cartilage is useful to identify events associated with development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (OA). To date, many in vitro injury models have used animal cartilage despite the greater clinical relevance of human cartilage. We aimed to characterize a new in vitro injury model using elderly human femoral head cartilage and compare its behavior to that of an existing model with adult bovine humeral head cartilage.
DESIGN: Mechanical properties of human and bovine cartilage disks were characterized by elastic modulus and hydraulic permeability in radially confined axial compression, and by Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, and direction-dependent radial strain in unconfined compression. Biochemical composition was assessed in terms of tissue water, solid, and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) contents. Responses to mechanical injury were assessed by observation of macroscopic superficial tissue cracks and histological measurements of cell viability following single injurious ramp loads at 7 or 70%/s strain rate to 3 or 14 MPa peak stress.
RESULTS: Confined compression moduli and Young's moduli were greater in elderly human femoral cartilage vs adult bovine humeral cartilage whereas hydraulic permeability was less. Radial deformations of axially compressed explant disks were more anisotropic (direction-dependent) for the human cartilage. In both cartilage sources, tissue cracking and associated cell death during injurious loading was common for 14 MPa peak stress at both strain rates.
CONCLUSION: Despite differences in mechanical properties, acute damage induced by injurious loading was similar in both elderly human femoral cartilage and adult bovine humeral cartilage, supporting the clinical relevance of animal-based cartilage injury models. However, inherent structural differences such as cell density may influence subsequent cell-mediated responses to injurious loading and affect the development of OA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16478669     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  8 in total

Review 1.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Hip chondrolabral mechanics during activities of daily living: Role of the labrum and interstitial fluid pressurization.

Authors:  Jocelyn N Todd; Travis G Maak; Gerard A Ateshian; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Moderate dynamic compression inhibits pro-catabolic response of cartilage to mechanical injury, tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6, but accentuates degradation above a strain threshold.

Authors:  Y Li; E H Frank; Y Wang; S Chubinskaya; H-H Huang; A J Grodzinsky
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Adsorption and distribution of fluorescent solutes near the articular surface of mechanically injured cartilage.

Authors:  Sarah G A Decker; Mohammad Moeini; Hooi Chuan Chin; Derek H Rosenzweig; Thomas M Quinn
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Li Wang; Qing-An Zhu; Fang-Min Mao; Yan Lin; Xiang-Yang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of focal metallic implants on opposing cartilage - an in-vitro study with an abrasion test machine.

Authors:  Theresa Diermeier; Arne Venjakob; Kevin Byrne; Rainer Burgkart; Peter Foehr; Stefan Milz; Andreas B Imhoff; Stephan Vogt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Effect of frequency on crack growth in articular cartilage.

Authors:  H Sadeghi; B M Lawless; D M Espino; D E T Shepherd
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  Tissue material properties and computational modelling of the human tibiofemoral joint: a critical review.

Authors:  Abby E Peters; Riaz Akhtar; Eithne J Comerford; Karl T Bates
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.