Literature DB >> 16478376

The onset of tense marking in children at risk for specific language impairment.

Pamela A Hadley1, Heather Short.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate measures reflecting the onset of tense marking for children between the ages of 2;0 (years;months) and 3;0.
METHOD: The validity of 4 cumulative measures of tense marker emergence and productivity was evaluated relative to existing measures of early grammatical development in a sample of 20 children followed longitudinally. Fourteen children were at risk for specific language impairment (AR-SLI group), and 6 children had low average language abilities (LA group).
RESULTS: All measures of onset were highly correlated with the traditional measures; however, children's progress toward mastery of grammatical tense marking was best explained by the productivity of their tense marking systems. Finally, the onset measures imposing productivity requirements best differentiated children in the LA group from those in the AR-SLI group.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical implications for using the late onset of tense marking to improve the early identification of SLI are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16478376     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/094)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  22 in total

1.  Grammatical Abilities in Young Cochlear Implant Recipients and Children With Normal Hearing Matched by Vocabulary Size.

Authors:  Jongmin Jung; David J Ertmer
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Evaluating English Morpheme Accuracy, Diversity, and Productivity Measures in Language Samples of Developing Bilinguals.

Authors:  Irina Potapova; Sophia Kelly; Philip N Combiths; Sonja L Pruitt-Lord
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Tracking the Growth of Tense and Agreement in Children With Specific Language Impairment: Differences Between Measures of Accuracy, Diversity, and Productivity.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Eileen Haebig; Patricia Deevy; Barbara Brown
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Evaluating maturational parallels in second language children and children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Mabel L Rice
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2010-04

5.  The Finite Verb Morphology Composite: Values From a Community Sample.

Authors:  Johanna M Rudolph; Christine A Dollaghan; Simone Crotteau
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Changing the Subject: The Place of Revisions in Grammatical Development.

Authors:  Matthew Rispoli
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Longitudinal development of phonology and morphology in children with late-identified mild-moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Mary Pat Moeller; Elizabeth McCleary; Coille Putman; Amy Tyler-Krings; Brenda Hoover; Patricia Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Index of productive syntax for children who speak African American English.

Authors:  Janna B Oetting; Brandi L Newkirk; Lekeitha R Hartfield; Christy G Wynn; Sonja L Pruitt; April W Garrity
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Comparing Tense and Agreement Productivity in Boys With Fragile X Syndrome, Children With Developmental Language Disorder, and Children With Typical Development.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hilvert; Jill Hoover; Audra Sterling; Susen Schroeder
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Judgments of omitted BE and DO in questions as extended finiteness clinical markers of specific language impairment (SLI) to 15 years: a study of growth and asymptote.

Authors:  Mabel L Rice; Lesa Hoffman; Ken Wexler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.