Literature DB >> 16478336

Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition.

Eiling Yee1, Julie C Sedivy.   

Abstract

Two experiments explore the activation of semantic information during spoken word recognition. Experiment 1 shows that as the name of an object unfolds (e.g., lock), eye movements are drawn to pictorial representations of both the named object and semantically related objects (e.g., key). Experiment 2 shows that objects semantically related to an uttered word's onset competitors become active enough to draw visual attention (e.g., if the uttered word is logs, participants fixate on key because of partial activation of lock), despite that the onset competitor itself is not present in the visual display. Together, these experiments provide detailed information about the activation of semantic information associated with a spoken word and its phonological competitors and demonstrate that transient semantic activation is sufficient to impact visual attention. ((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16478336     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  68 in total

Review 1.  On the mental representations originating during the interaction between language and vision.

Authors:  Ramesh Kumar Mishra; Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-05-06

2.  Metaphorically feeling: comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Randall Stilla; K Sathian
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Bimodal bilinguals co-activate both languages during spoken comprehension.

Authors:  Anthony Shook; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-07-07

4.  Am I looking at a cat or a dog? Gaze in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia is subject to excessive taxonomic capture.

Authors:  Mustafa Seckin; M-Marsel Mesulam; Joel L Voss; Wei Huang; Emily J Rogalski; Robert S Hurley
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 1.710

5.  Interaction between phonological and semantic representations: time matters.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-08-23

6.  Lexical interference effects in sentence processing: evidence from the visual world paradigm and self-organizing models.

Authors:  Anuenue Kukona; Pyeong Whan Cho; James S Magnuson; Whitney Tabor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Lexical learning and lexical processing in children with developmental language impairments.

Authors:  Kate Nation
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

9.  Lexical activation during sentence comprehension in adolescents with history of Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Arielle Borovsky; Erin Burns; Jeffrey L Elman; Julia L Evans
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.288

10.  Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Vicki M Samelson; Sung Hee Lee; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.