Literature DB >> 16476750

The polypill: at what price would it become cost effective?

Oscar H Franco1, Ewout W Steyerberg, Chris de Laet.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A promising concept in cardiovascular disease prevention (the polypill) was introduced in 2003. Although the polypill may seem as an effective intervention, data on its costs and cost effectiveness remain unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum price of the polypill for it to be a cost effective alternative in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
METHODS: Data on the hypothetical effects of the polypill were taken from the literature. Using data from the Framingham heart study and the Framingham offspring study, life tables were built to model the assumed benefits of the polypill. Using a third party payer perspective and a 10 years time horizon, the authors calculated what should be the maximum drug cost of the polypill for it to be cost effective (using a 20,000 euro/year of life saved threshold) in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease among populations at different levels of absolute risk of coronary heart disease and age.
RESULTS: To be cost effective among populations at levels of 10 year coronary heart disease risk over 20% (high risk), the annual cost of medication for the polypill therapy should be no more than 302 euro or 410 euro for men at age 50 and 60 years respectively. For cost effective prevention in populations at levels of coronary heart disease risk between 10% and 20% the costs should be two to three times lower.
CONCLUSION: Although the polypill could theoretically be a highly effective intervention, the costs of the medication could be its caveat for implementation in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16476750      PMCID: PMC2465563          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.040253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  15 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of HMG coenzyme reductase inhibitors; whom to treat?

Authors:  B A van Hout; M L Simoons
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Risk factor thresholds: their existence under scrutiny.

Authors:  M R Law; N J Wald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-29

3.  How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations.

Authors:  A Laupacis; D Feeny; A S Detsky; P X Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  T R DAWBER; G F MEADORS; F E MOORE
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1951-03

5.  Comparison of baseline and repeated measure covariate techniques in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  L A Cupples; R B D'Agostino; K Anderson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Clinical context: current concepts of coronary heart disease management.

Authors:  T A Jacobson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-04-16       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Effect of statins on risk of coronary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  J C LaRosa; J He; S Vupputuri
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Hayden; Michael Pignone; Christopher Phillips; Cynthia Mulrow
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Cardiovascular disease risk profiles.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P M Odell; P W Wilson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; M Feinleib; P M McNamara; R J Garrison; W P Castelli
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  What is the future of stroke prevention?: debate: polypill versus personalized risk factor modification.

Authors:  Walter N Kernan; Lenore J Launer; Larry B Goldstein
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Fixed-dose combination therapy and secondary cardiovascular prevention: rationale, selection of drugs and target population.

Authors:  Ginés Sanz; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-12-23

Review 3.  Issues to consider in the pharmaceutical development of a cardiovascular polypill.

Authors:  Antonio Guglietta; Marta Guerrero
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-12-23

4.  The polypill in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: cost-effectiveness in the Dutch population.

Authors:  Paul F van Gils; Eelco A B Over; Heleen H Hamberg-van Reenen; G Ardine de Wit; Matthijs van den Berg; Albertine J Schuit; Peter M Engelfriet
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Cost-effectiveness of medical interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease in a sub-Saharan African country--the case of Tanzania.

Authors:  Bjarne Robberstad; Yusuf Hemed; Ole F Norheim
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2007-02-22

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of use of a polypill versus usual care or best practice for primary prevention in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Sue Jowett; Pelham Barton; Andrea Roalfe; Kate Fletcher; F D Richard Hobbs; Richard J McManus; Jonathan Mant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cost-effectiveness of fixed-dose combination pill (Polypill) in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Reza Jahangiri; Aziz Rezapour; Reza Malekzadeh; Alireza Olyaeemanesh; Gholamreza Roshandel; Seyed Abbas Motevalian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.