Literature DB >> 16475761

Calculation and validation of the use of effective attenuation coefficient for attenuation correction in In-111 SPECT.

Youngho Seo1, Kenneth H Wong, Bruce H Hasegawa.   

Abstract

Nuclear medicine tracers using 111In as a radiolabel are increasing in their use, especially in the domain of oncologic imaging. In these applications, it often is critical to have the capability of quantifying radionuclide uptake and being able to relate it to the biological properties of the tumor. However, images from single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can be degraded by photon attenuation, photon scattering, and collimator blurring; without compensation for these effects, image quality can be degraded, and accurate and precise quantification is impossible. Although attenuation correction for SPECT is becoming more common, most implementations can only model single energy radionuclides such as 99mTc and 123I. Thus, attenuation correction for 111In is challenging because it emits two photons (171 and 245 keV) at nearly equal rates (90.2% and 94% emission probabilities). In this paper, we present a method of calculating a single "effective" attenuation coefficient for the dual-energy emissions of 111In, and that can be used to correct for photon attenuation in radionuclide images acquired with this radionuclide. Using this methodology, we can derive an effective linear attenuation coefficient Micro(eff) and an effective photon energy E(eff) based on the emission probabilities and linear attenuation coefficients of the 111In photons. This approach allows us to treat the emissions from 111In as a single photon with an effective energy of 210 keV. We obtained emission projection data from a tank filled with a uniform solution of 111In. The projection data were reconstructed using an iterative maximum-likelihood algorithm with no attenuation correction, and with attenuation correction assuming photon energies of 171, 245, and 210 keV (the derived E(eff)). The reconstructed tomographic images demonstrate that the use of no attenuation correction, or correction assuming photon energies of 171 or 245 keV introduces inaccuracies into the reconstructed radioactivity distribution when compared against the effective energy method. In summary, this work provides both a theoretical framework and experimental methodology of attenuation correction for the dual-energy emissions from 111In. Although these results are specific to 111In, the foundation could easily be extended to other multiple-energy isotopes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16475761     DOI: 10.1118/1.2128084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  Fused radioimmunoscintigraphy for treatment planning.

Authors:  Rodney J Ellis; Deborah A Kaminsky
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

2.  Comparison of residence time estimation methods for radioimmunotherapy dosimetry and treatment planning--Monte Carlo simulation studies.

Authors:  B He; R L Wahl; Y Du; G Sgouros; H Jacene; I Flinn; E C Frey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  Technological development and advances in single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Youngho Seo; Carina Mari; Bruce H Hasegawa
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  Task Equivalence for Model and Human-Observer Comparisons in SPECT Localization Studies.

Authors:  Anando Sen; Faraz Kalantari; Howard C Gifford
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 1.679

5.  Phase I Imaging and Pharmacodynamic Trial of CS-1008 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Marika Ciprotti; Niall C Tebbutt; Fook-Thean Lee; Sze-Ting Lee; Hui K Gan; David C McKee; Graeme J O'Keefe; Sylvia J Gong; Geoffrey Chong; Wendie Hopkins; Bridget Chappell; Fiona E Scott; Martin W Brechbiel; Archie N Tse; Mendel Jansen; Manabu Matsumura; Masakatsu Kotsuma; Rira Watanabe; Ralph Venhaus; Robert A Beckman; Jonathan Greenberg; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Image quantification for radiation dose calculations--limitations and uncertainties.

Authors:  J M Pereira; M G Stabin; F R A Lima; M I C C Guimarães; J W Forrester
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  In vivo tumor grading of prostate cancer using quantitative 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Youngho Seo; Carina Mari Aparici; Matthew R Cooperberg; Badrinath R Konety; Randall A Hawkins
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  An energy-optimized collimator design for a CZT-based SPECT camera.

Authors:  Fenghua Weng; Srijeeta Bagchi; Yunlong Zan; Qiu Huang; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 1.455

9.  Pre-clinical quantitative imaging and mouse-specific dosimetry for 111In-labelled radiotracers.

Authors:  Ana M Denis-Bacelar; Sarah E Cronin; Chiara Da Pieve; Rowena L Paul; Sue A Eccles; Terence J Spinks; Carol Box; Adrian Hall; Jane K Sosabowski; Gabriela Kramer-Marek; Glenn D Flux
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 10.  Quantitative Imaging for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy Dosimetry - Technical Review.

Authors:  Tiantian Li; Edwin C I Ao; Bieke Lambert; Boudewijn Brans; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Greta S P Mok
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.