Literature DB >> 16469577

Evidence to support a continued stage migration and decrease in prostate cancer specific mortality.

Shira L Galper1, Ming-Hui Chen, William J Catalona, Kimberly A Roehl, Jerome P Richie, Anthony V D'Amico.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated whether the proportion of patients with a postoperative PSA-DT less than 3 months, a surrogate for PCSM, decreased significantly during the PSA era.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1988 and July 2002, 3,719 men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with RP comprised the study cohort. A chi-square metric was used to compare the preoperative and postoperative characteristics, 5-year actual PSA failure rates, and PSA-DTs for patients treated during the 2 equally divided eras of the early PSA era, July 1988 to July 1995 and the late PSA era, August 1995 to July 2002.
RESULTS: Patients presenting in the more recent PSA era were of younger age (p < 0.0001), with earlier stage (p < 0.0001) and lower grade disease (p = 0.01). Similarly, patients had lower grade (p < 0.001), stage (p < 0.0001), and positive margin (p < 0.0001) and lymph node rates (p = 0.0002) at RP. The 5-year actual PSA failure rates decreased from 14.3% in the early PSA era to 2.5% in the later PSA era (p < 0.0001). There was a 37% reduction in the proportion of patients with a PSA-DT less than 3 months, corresponding to a decrease in absolute magnitude from 9% to 5.7% between the 2 eras. Absolute reductions of 3.1% and 9% were also noted for the proportion of PSA-DTs of 3 to 5.99 months and 6 to 11.99 months, respectively, whereas PSA-DTs of 12 months or greater increased by 15.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: During the recent PSA era, postoperative PSA failure has significantly decreased and PSA-DTs have increased, suggesting that PCSM will continue to decrease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16469577     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00419-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

1.  Biochemical outcome of small-volume or insignificant prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in Japanese population.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Akiko Okamoto; Atsushi Imai; Tohru Yoneyama; Shingo Hatakeyama; Takahiro Yoneyama; Takuya Koie; Noritaka Kaminura; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Cancer/testis antigens: novel tools for discerning aggressive and non-aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takumi Shiraishi; Robert H Getzenberg; Prakash Kulkarni
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  Active surveillance in prostate cancer: the need to standardize.

Authors:  Xavier Filella; Juan Alcover; Rafael Molina
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-05-28

4.  Adjuvant androgen deprivation for high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: SWOG S9921 study.

Authors:  Tanya B Dorff; Thomas W Flaig; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Gregory P Swanson; David P Wood; Wael A Sakr; Nancy A Dawson; Naomi B Haas; E David Crawford; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Ian M Thompson; L Michael Glode
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Saturation biopsies for prostate cancer: current uses and future prospects.

Authors:  Nicolas B Delongchamps; Gabriel P Haas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Metastatic prostate cancer with malignant ascites: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Ifeanyi Ani; Mark Costaldi; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Active surveillance and radical therapy in prostate cancer: can focal therapy offer the middle way?

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Mark Emberton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Salvage radical prostatectomy as management of locally recurrent prostate cancer: outcomes and complications.

Authors:  James S Rosoff; Stephen J Savage; Sandip M Prasad
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of extended biopsies for the staging of microfocal prostate cancers in autopsy specimen.

Authors:  N B Delongchamps; G de la Roza; V Chandan; R Jones; G Threatte; M Jumbelic; G P Haas
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Saturation biopsies on autopsied prostates for detecting and characterizing prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas B Delongchamps; Gustavo de la Roza; Richard Jones; Mary Jumbelic; Gabriel P Haas
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.