Literature DB >> 16459156

Young-elderly differences in bone density, geometry and strength indices depend on proximal femur sub-region: a cross sectional study in Caucasian-American women.

M Meta1, Y Lu, J H Keyak, T Lang.   

Abstract

Fragility fractures at the trochanter (TR) and the femoral neck (FN) have distinct etiologies, but the underlying age-related structural changes at these proximal femoral sub-regions are poorly understood. 28 young (41+/-3 years) and 124 elderly (74+/-3 years) healthy Caucasian women underwent volumetric quantitative computed tomography at the hip. Integral (i), cortical (c) and trabecular (t) bone mineral density and content (BMD, BMC) were measured. Geometric parameters included cross sectional area (CSA), and volumes of the integral, cortical and trabecular regions (VOL). Structural measures included indices of compressive (Compstr) and bending (BSI) strength. After adjusting for height and weight, an F-test was used to compare the TR and the FN mean values between young and elderly and to test for interaction to compare logarithmic difference of young and elderly (log(Young)-log(Elderly), Y/Ed) between the FN and the TR in an ANOCOVA model. All BMC, iBMD and tBMD values were significantly lower in elderly than in young women, with the largest Y/Ed in the FN tBMC and tBMD (P<0.0011 and P<0.0001). cBMD in young and elderly groups was not significantly different at the TR while at the FN it was greater (P=0.0075) in elderly than young women, showing significant Y/Ed (P=0.0003) dependence on skeletal site. Elderly women had significantly larger iVOL and CSA values (0.0001<P<0.0051), except for the FN iVOL. cVOL values were smaller in elderly than young women (P<0.0001). Y/Ed in bone geometry differed by sub-region only for cVOL measures (P=0.0267). Despite larger CSA and iVOL measures in elderly, the younger women had greater Compstr (P<0.0001) and BSI (P=0.0051). Thus, although both the TR and the FN appear to increase in size with age, this enlargement is insufficient to protect against loss of bone strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16459156      PMCID: PMC1482801          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  37 in total

1.  Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight.

Authors:  Thomas Lang; Adrian LeBlanc; Harlan Evans; Ying Lu; Harry Genant; Alice Yu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  The mechanostat: a proposed pathogenic mechanism of osteoporoses and the bone mass effects of mechanical and nonmechanical agents.

Authors:  H M Frost
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1987-04

3.  Functional adaptation of bone to increased stress. An experimental study.

Authors:  A E Goodship; L E Lanyon; H McFie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Age changes in human bone: a microradiographic and histological study of subperiosteal and periosteal calcifications.

Authors:  G Zagba-Mongalima; M Goret-Nicaise; A Dhem
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.140

5.  Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure.

Authors:  R W McCalden; J A McGeough; M B Barker; C M Court-Brown
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to allometric limb bone scaling.

Authors:  C T Rubin; L E Lanyon
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1984-03-21       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Functional strain as a determinant for bone remodeling.

Authors:  L E Lanyon
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Significance of endogenic factors in the location of fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  E K Dretakis; N A Christodoulou
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1983-04

9.  Cortical aging differences and fracture implications for the human femoral neck.

Authors:  T M Boyce; R D Bloebaum
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  The association of age, race, and sex with the location of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  R Y Hinton; G S Smith
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  7 in total

1.  Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image.

Authors:  C M Langton; S Pisharody; J H Keyak
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Effects of age and sex on the strength and cortical thickness of the femoral neck.

Authors:  R D Carpenter; S Sigurdsson; S Zhao; Y Lu; G Eiriksdottir; G Sigurdsson; B Y Jonsson; S Prevrhal; T B Harris; K Siggeirsdottir; V Guðnason; T F Lang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Age-related loss of proximal femoral strength in elderly men and women: the Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility Study--Reykjavik.

Authors:  T F Lang; S Sigurdsson; G Karlsdottir; D Oskarsdottir; A Sigmarsdottir; J Chengshi; J Kornak; T B Harris; G Sigurdsson; B Y Jonsson; K Siggeirsdottir; G Eiriksdottir; V Gudnason; J H Keyak
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men.

Authors:  Eric S Orwoll; Lynn M Marshall; Carrie M Nielson; Steven R Cummings; Jodi Lapidus; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Nancy Lane; Paul R Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Structural patterns of the proximal femur in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Roy Harnish; Isra Saeed; Timothy Streeper; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Shreyasee Amin; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Terry M Therneau; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Xiaoguang Cheng; L Joseph Melton; Joyce H Keyak; Vilmundur Gudnason; Sundeep Khosla; Tamara B Harris; Thomas F Lang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Fracture risk assessment in older adults using a combination of selected quantitative computed tomography bone measures: a subanalysis of the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study.

Authors:  Nahid J Rianon; Thomas F Lang; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Brynjolfur Y Jonsson; Melissa Garcia; Binbing Yu; Asha S Kapadia; Wendell C Taylor; Beatrice J Selwyn; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer; Tamara B Harris
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  The rate of hip osteoarthritis in patients with proximal femoral fractures versus hip contusion.

Authors:  B Robstad; F Frihagen; L Nordsletten
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.507

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.