Literature DB >> 16453077

In vitro infectability of prosthetic mesh by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

A G Harrell1, Y W Novitsky, K W Kercher, M Foster, J M Burns, T S Kuwada, B T Heniford.   

Abstract

Although mesh use is important for effective herniorrhaphy in adults, prosthetic infections can cause serious morbidity. Bacterial adherence to the mesh is a known precursor to prosthetic infection. We compared the ability of common mesh prosthetics to resist bacterial adherence. The meshes studied included polypropylene (Marlex, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) with and without silver chlorhexidine coating (DualMesh Plus and Dualmesh) composite meshes (Composix E/X, Proceed, and Parietex Composite) and lightweight polypropylene meshes (TiMesh, Ultrapro, and Vypro). Fifteen samples of each mesh type were individually inoculated with a suspension of 10(8 )methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in tryptic soy broth. After incubation at 37 degrees C for 1 h, the mesh pieces were then removed and serially washed. The colony-forming units (CFU) of MRSA present in the initial inoculum, at the end of the 1-h warm-water bath (broth count), and the pooled washes (wash count), were determined using serial dilutions and spot plating. The bacteria not accounted for in the broth or wash counts were considered adhered to the mesh. Samples of each mesh type were also analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data are presented as the mean percentage adherence with ANOVA and Tukey's test used to determine significance (P<0.05). The DualMesh Plus mesh had no detectable MRSA in the broth or the pooled wash samples. Dualmesh had less adherence compared with Marlex, Proceed, and Vypro (P<0.05). Conversely, Vypro had a statistically higher adherence (96%, P<0.05) as compared to TiMesh, Ultrapro, Composix E/X, and Parietex Composite. SEM confirmed bacterial adherence to all the mesh types except DualMesh Plus. The ability of a biomaterial to resist infection has an important clinical significance. DualMesh Plus, due to its antimicrobial coating, is the only mesh type of the nine tested that demonstrated a bactericidal property. Standard PTFE (Dualmesh) also had less bacterial adherence. Vypro demonstrated an increase in bacterial adherence; this was possibly due to the multifilament polyglactin 910 weaved within the prolene component of the mesh.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16453077     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-005-0056-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  26 in total

1.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in incisional hernia repair using a prosthesis.

Authors:  A Ríos; J M Rodríguez; V Munitiz; P Alcaraz; D Pérez Flores; P Parrilla
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement.

Authors:  F S Haddad; B A Masri; D Campbell; R W McGraw; C P Beauchamp; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-08

3.  Tissue reactions to synthetic materials.

Authors:  J T SCALES
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1953-08

Review 4.  Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces.

Authors:  Y H An; R J Friedman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998

5.  In vivo analysis of bacterial biofilm formation on facial plastic bioimplants.

Authors:  S C Malaisrie; S Malekzadeh; J F Biedlingmaier
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for herniorrhaphy and breast surgery.

Authors:  R Platt; D F Zaleznik; C C Hopkins; E P Dellinger; A W Karchmer; C S Bryan; J F Burke; M A Wikler; S K Marino; K F Holbrook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Do topical antibiotics provide improved prophylaxis against bacterial growth in the presence of polypropylene mesh?

Authors:  M G Troy; Q S Dong; P B Dobrin; D Hecht
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Comparison of prosthetic materials for abdominal wall reconstruction in the presence of contamination and infection.

Authors:  G L Brown; J D Richardson; M A Malangoni; G R Tobin; D Ackerman; H C Polk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Epidemiology and antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria causing skin and soft tissue infections in the USA and Europe: a guide to appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  Mark E Jones; James A Karlowsky; Deborah C Draghi; Clyde Thornsberry; Daniel F Sahm; Dilip Nathwani
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.283

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative Mesh Infection-Still a Concern in Laparoscopic Era.

Authors:  Rajvilas Narkhede; N M Shah; P R Dalal; Chirantan Mangukia; Shreyas Dholaria
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Wolfgang B Gaertner; Margaret E Bonsack; John P Delaney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Experimental study on the use of a chlorhexidine-loaded carboxymethylcellulose gel as antibacterial coating for hernia repair meshes.

Authors:  B Pérez-Köhler; S Benito-Martínez; M Rodríguez; F García-Moreno; G Pascual; J M Bellón
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Bioprosthetic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Donald P Baumann; Charles E Butler
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  In vivo analysis of the morphologic characteristics of synthetic mesh to resist MRSA adherence.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Blatnik; David M Krpata; Michael R Jacobs; Yue Gao; Yuri W Novitsky; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  An experimental study exploring the relationship between the size of bacterial inoculum and bacterial adherence to prosthetic mesh.

Authors:  David L Sanders; Andrew N Kingsnorth; Jaynnie Lambie; Peter Bond; Roy Moate; Jane A Steer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of lysostaphin-coated hernia repair meshes.

Authors:  Rohan Satishkumar; Sriram Sankar; Yuliya Yurko; Amy Lincourt; John Shipp; B Todd Heniford; Alexey Vertegel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Novel in vitro model for assessing susceptibility of synthetic hernia repair meshes to Staphylococcus aureus infection using green fluorescent protein-labeled bacteria and modern imaging techniques.

Authors:  Ihab Halaweish; Karem Harth; Ann-Marie Broome; Gabriela Voskerician; Michael R Jacobs; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.150

9.  History of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) surgical site infection may not be a contraindication to ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh: a preliminary report.

Authors:  C W Hicks; J A Blatnik; D M Krpata; Y W Novitsky; M J Rosen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Mesh repair of common abdominal hernias: a review on experimental and clinical studies.

Authors:  R Penttinen; J M Grönroos
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.