Literature DB >> 3159353

Comparison of prosthetic materials for abdominal wall reconstruction in the presence of contamination and infection.

G L Brown, J D Richardson, M A Malangoni, G R Tobin, D Ackerman, H C Polk.   

Abstract

Abdominal wall defects resulting from trauma, invasive infection, or hernia present a difficult problem for the surgeon. In order to study the problems associated with the prosthetic materials used for abdominal wall reconstruction, an animal model was used to simulate abdominal wall defects in the presence of peritonitis and invasive infection. One hundred guinea pigs were repaired with either polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) or polypropylene mesh (PPM). Our experiments included intra-operative contamination with Staphylococcus aureus. We found significantly fewer organisms (p less than 0.05) adherent to the PTFE than to the PPM when antibiotics were administered after surgery, as well as when no antibiotics were given. In the presence of peritonitis, we found no real difference in numbers of intraperitoneal bacteria present whether PTFE or PPM was used. In all instances, the PTFE patches produced fewer adhesions and were more easily removed. From these experiments, it appears that PTFE may be associated with fewer problems than PPM in the presence of contamination and infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3159353      PMCID: PMC1250799          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198506000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  16 in total

1.  Marlex mesh, a new plastic mesh for replacing tissue defects. II. Clinical studies.

Authors:  F C USHER; J G FRIES; J L OCHSNER; L L TUTTLE
Journal:  AMA Arch Surg       Date:  1959-01

2.  The virulence of Staphylococcus pyogenes for man; a study of the problems of wound infection.

Authors:  S D ELEK; P E CONEN
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1957-12

3.  Tissue reactions to synthetic materials.

Authors:  J T SCALES
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1953-08

4.  Use of Marlex mesh in acute loss of the abdominal wall due to infection.

Authors:  W C Boyd
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1977-02

5.  Comparison of Marlex mesh and microporous teflon sheets when used for hernia repair in the experimental animal.

Authors:  M P Elliott; G L Juler
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Peritoneal drainage versus non-drainage for generalized peritonitis from ruptured appendicitis in children: a prospective study.

Authors:  J A Haller; I J Shaker; J S Donahoo; L Schnaufer; J J White
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Ogilvie's method applied to infected wound disruption.

Authors:  J A Goris
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1980-09

8.  Randomization of autogenous vein and polytetrafluorethylene grafts in femoral-distal reconstruction.

Authors:  J J Bergan; F J Veith; V M Bernhard; J S Yao; W R Flinn; S K Gupta; L A Scher; R H Samson; J B Towne
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Management of acute full-thickness losses of the abdominal wall.

Authors:  H H Stone; T C Fabian; M L Turkleson; M J Jurkiewicz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Scanning electron microscopy of bacteria adherent to intravascular catheters.

Authors:  T R Franson; N K Sheth; H D Rose; P G Sohnle
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  35 in total

1.  Milestones in the history of hernia surgery: prosthetic repair.

Authors:  Raymond C Read
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Initial experience of double-layer tension free reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with porcine acellular dermal collagen implant and polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  F M Shaikh; T E Kennedy; E G Kavanagh; P A Grace
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  The contributions of Usher and others to the elimination of tension from groin herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  Raymond C Read
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Anatomical repair of large incisional hernias.

Authors:  A Loh; J S Rajkumar; L M South
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Susceptibility of prosthetic biomaterials to infection.

Authors:  A M Carbonell; K W Kercher; R F Sing; B T Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy: a review of 208 cases.

Authors:  C T Frantzides; M A Carlson; J G Zografakis; A K Madan; R E Moore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Wolfgang B Gaertner; Margaret E Bonsack; John P Delaney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Enterocutaneous fistula associated with ePTFE mesh: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Foda; M A Carlson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Reconstruction of the abdominal wall by using a combination of the human acellular dermal matrix implant and an interpositional omentum flap after extensive tumor resection in patients with abdominal wall neoplasm: a preliminary result.

Authors:  Yan Gu; Rui Tang; Ding-Quan Gong; Yun-Liang Qian
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Planned ventral hernia. Staged management for acute abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  T C Fabian; M A Croce; F E Pritchard; G Minard; W L Hickerson; R L Howell; M J Schurr; K A Kudsk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.