Literature DB >> 1645246

The double-stapled ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis. A prospective review of sphincter function and clinical outcome.

S D Wexner1, K James, D G Jagelman.   

Abstract

Fifteen consecutive patients (nine males and six females) who underwent construction of a double-stapled ileoanal reservoir (DS-IAR) were prospectively evaluated. Mean and maximal resting pressures preoperatively, before ileostomy closure, and at 12 months, were 53 and 84 mm Hg, 39 and 62 mm Hg, and 62 and 81 mm Hg. Mean and maximal squeeze pressures at those same time periods were 96 and 153 mm Hg, 111 and 173 mm Hg, and 95 and 168 mm Hg. There were no significant decreases in either resting or squeeze pressure between preoperative values and those obtained 12 months after surgery. However, the length of the high pressure zone decreased from 3.8 cm preoperatively to 2.3 cm at 12 months. This reflects the sacrifice of the cephalad 1.5 cm of the internal anal sphincter necessary to effect this anastomosis at a mean of 1.4 cm from the dentate line. However, this maneuver did not result in poor continence. Eleven patients whose ileostomies were closed for a mean of 9 months, ranging from 3 to 15 months, were evaluated regarding functional outcome. Only one patient had any incontinence and this patient had incomplete circular-stapled tissue rings, which necessitated transanal suture repair of the anastomotic defect. Similarly, three of the four patients who sometimes or rarely use a pad at night had transanal-suture reinforcement. Ten of the 11 patients never wear a pad during the day. No pelvic or perianal sepsis occurred. Stratified squamous epithelium was found in 6 of the 13 distal stapler "donuts" that were examined. In addition, 10 patients underwent biopsy of the tissue immediately caudad to the circular staple line at the time of ileostomy closure; in five, only stratified squamous epithelium was noted. The DS-IAR is associated with excellent objective physiologic and subjective functional results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1645246     DOI: 10.1007/bf02049935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  8 in total

1.  Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic versus open surgery: is there a difference?

Authors:  Art Hiranyakas; Assar Rather; Giovanna da Silva; Eric G Weiss; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; E L Sugerman; J G Meador; H H Newsome; J M Kellum; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Incidence of and risk factors for dysplasia in mucosectomy area in ulcerative colitis patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Ken Sagayama; Hiroki Ikeuchi; Takashi Nishigami; Hiroki Nakano; Motoi Uchino; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Masafumi Noda; Hidenori Yanagi; Takehira Yamamura
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Is age relevant to functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis?: prospective assessment of 122 cases.

Authors:  Y Takao; R Gilliland; J J Nogueras; E G Weiss; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.

Authors:  Alex Kartheuser; Pierre Stangherlin; Dimitri Brandt; Christophe Remue; Christine Sempoux
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Does laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch anal anastomosis reduce the length of hospitalization?

Authors:  S L Schmitt; S M Cohen; S D Wexner; J J Nogueras; D G Jagelman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  An audit of restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  M R Keighley; S Grobler; I Bain
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Postoperative changes of manometry after restorative proctocolectomy in Korean ulcerative colitis patients.

Authors:  Se Heon Oh; Yong Sik Yoon; Jong Lyul Lee; Chan Wook Kim; In Ja Park; Seok-Byung Lim; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.