BACKGROUND: We evaluate the performance of ovulation detection methods and present new approaches, including evaluation of methods for precision, combining multiple markers into a hierarchical system and using ovulation markers in intermittent sampling designs. METHODS: With serum LH peak day as the 'gold standard' of ovulation, we estimated accuracy and precision of ovulation day algorithms using 30 ovulatory menstrual cycles with daily urinary and serum hormones and transvaginal ultrasound. Sensitivity and specificity for estimating the presence of ovulation were tested using visually assessed ovulatory (30) and anovulatory (22) cycles. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 70 to 100% for estimating presence of ovulation with twice-per-cycle, weekly, twice weekly, every-other-day and daily specimens. A combined hierarchical method estimated ovulation day using daily specimens within +/-2 days of the gold standard in 93% of cases. Accuracy of estimating ovulation day within +/-2 days using intermittent sampling ranged from 40% (weekly sampling) to 97% (every-other-day). CONCLUSIONS: A combined hierarchical algorithm using precise and accurate markers allows maximal use of available data for efficient and objective identification of ovulation using daily specimens. In intermittent sampling designs, the presence and the timing of ovulation can be estimated with good sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.
BACKGROUND: We evaluate the performance of ovulation detection methods and present new approaches, including evaluation of methods for precision, combining multiple markers into a hierarchical system and using ovulation markers in intermittent sampling designs. METHODS: With serum LH peak day as the 'gold standard' of ovulation, we estimated accuracy and precision of ovulation day algorithms using 30 ovulatory menstrual cycles with daily urinary and serum hormones and transvaginal ultrasound. Sensitivity and specificity for estimating the presence of ovulation were tested using visually assessed ovulatory (30) and anovulatory (22) cycles. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 70 to 100% for estimating presence of ovulation with twice-per-cycle, weekly, twice weekly, every-other-day and daily specimens. A combined hierarchical method estimated ovulation day using daily specimens within +/-2 days of the gold standard in 93% of cases. Accuracy of estimating ovulation day within +/-2 days using intermittent sampling ranged from 40% (weekly sampling) to 97% (every-other-day). CONCLUSIONS: A combined hierarchical algorithm using precise and accurate markers allows maximal use of available data for efficient and objective identification of ovulation using daily specimens. In intermittent sampling designs, the presence and the timing of ovulation can be estimated with good sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.
Authors: Kathleen A O'Connor; Eleanor Brindle; Jane Shofer; Benjamin C Trumble; Jennifer D Aranda; Karen Rice; Marc Tatar Journal: Am J Phys Anthropol Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 2.868
Authors: Gwinnett Ladson; William C Dodson; Stephanie D Sweet; Anthony E Archibong; Allen R Kunselman; Laurence M Demers; Nancy I Williams; Ponjola Coney; Richard S Legro Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Bob Z Sun; Tairmae Kangarloo; Judith M Adams; Patrick M Sluss; Corrine K Welt; Donald W Chandler; David T Zava; John A McGrath; David M Umbach; Janet E Hall; Natalie D Shaw Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Kristine E Lynch; Sunni L Mumford; Karen C Schliep; Brian W Whitcomb; Shvetha M Zarek; Anna Z Pollack; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson; Michelle Danaher; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Audrey J Gaskins; Enrique F Schisterman Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 7.329