Literature DB >> 16437289

BIS monitor findings during self-hypnosis.

Christopher M Burkle1, Christopher J Jankowski, Laurence C Torsher, Edwin H Rho, Amy C Degnim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We describe BIS values for a patient undergoing breast surgery under self-hypnosis in order to access the value of global surface EEG measures occurring during this process.
METHODS: Following verbal consent, a BIS(TM) monitor (Aspect Medical, Newton MA) was placed and values measured while the patient performed self-hypnosis for a simple mastectomy and sentinel node biopsy.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine minutes after incision the BIS value decreased transiently to 72 followed by several other transient decreases, the lowest of which was 59. Values remained at approximately 90 throughout most of the operative period. The BIS value returned to baseline after completion of the operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that hypnosis is a dynamic cerebral process incorporating many changes within brain activation centers and one distinct from dissociative patterns seen under anesthesia. Current algorithms employed by the BIS(TM) monitor add little to the management of patients utilizing hypnosis for analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16437289     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-005-6539-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  13 in total

Review 1.  Bispectral Index: better information for sedation in the intensive care unit?

Authors:  B A Shapiro
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Electromyographic activity falsely elevates the bispectral index.

Authors:  J Bruhn; T W Bouillon; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  Mind-body medicine: state of the science, implications for practice.

Authors:  John A Astin; Shauna L Shapiro; David M Eisenberg; Kelly L Forys
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia.

Authors:  I J Rampil
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 5.  Hypnotic control of pain: historical perspectives and future prospects.

Authors:  J F Chaves; S F Dworkin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  1997-10

6.  Early uses of hypnosis as surgical anesthesia.

Authors:  M A Gravitz
Journal:  Am J Clin Hypn       Date:  1988-01

Review 7.  Imagery and hypnosis in the treatment of cancer patients.

Authors:  D Spiegel; R Moore
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.990

8.  Biasing effect of the electromyogram on BIS: a controlled study during high-dose fentanyl induction.

Authors:  Maurizio Renna; Tim Wigmore; Ali Mofeez; Charles Gillbe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 9.  Neurophysiological evaluation of pain.

Authors:  B Bromm; J Lorenz
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-10

10.  EEG asymmetry and heart rate during experience of hypnotic analgesia in high and low hypnotizables.

Authors:  V De Pascalis; M Perrone
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1996 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 2.997

View more
  2 in total

1.  Bispectral Index Alterations and Associations With Autonomic Changes During Hypnosis in Trauma Center Researchers: Formative Evaluation Study.

Authors:  C Michael Dunham; Amanda J Burger; Barbara M Hileman; Elisha A Chance; Amy E Hutchinson
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-05-26

2.  Hypnosis for sedation in transesophageal echocardiography: a comparison with midazolam.

Authors:  Gulay Eren; Yuksel Dogan; Guray Demir; Evrim Tulubas; Oya Hergunsel; Yasemin Tekdos; Murat Dogan; Deniz Bilgi; Yesim Abut
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.