Literature DB >> 8792204

EEG asymmetry and heart rate during experience of hypnotic analgesia in high and low hypnotizables.

V De Pascalis1, M Perrone.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of hypnotic analgesia and hypnosis on bilateral EEG activity recorded from frontal, central and posterior areas during three painful electrical stimulation conditions: waking, hypnosis/no-analgesia, hypnosis/analgesia. Eight high-hypnotizable and eight low-hypnotizable (right handed) subjects participated in the experiment. The following measures were obtained: pain and distress tolerance ratings; EEG spectral amplitudes for the frequency bands: delta (0.5-3.75 Hz), theta 1 (4-5.75 Hz), theta 2 (6-7.75 Hz), alpha 1 (8-9.75 Hz), alpha 2 (10-12.75 Hz), beta 1 (13-15.75 Hz), beta 2 (16-31.75 Hz), total band (0.5-31.75 Hz), '40-Hz' (36-44 Hz); cardiac interbeat interval (ms); mid-frequency and high-frequency peaks from power spectral analysis of heart period variability. During hypnosis/analgesia, high hypnotizable subjects displayed significant reductions in pain and distress scores compared to hypnosis/no-analgesia and waking conditions. In each experimental condition these subjects displayed significant lower total and beta 1 amplitudes compared to low hypnotizables. High hypnotizables, on central and posterior recording sites, during both hypnosis/analgesia and hypnosis/no-analgesia conditions also showed total and delta EEG amplitude reductions in both hemispheres and a theta 1 amplitude reduction in the left hemisphere. However, for total, delta and beta 1 bands in the hypnosis/analgesia condition the amplitude reduction was more pronounced in the right hemisphere as shown by hemispheric asymmetry in favor of the left hemisphere. Low hypnotizables, on posterior recording sites, displayed a delta amplitude reduction during hypnosis/no-analgesia and hypnosis/analgesia conditions. These subjects also showed, for all recording sites, a reduction in theta 1 amplitude during hypnosis/no-analgesia compared to the waking condition. Lows, however, failed in evidencing amplitude differences between hypnosis/no-analgesia and hypnosis/analgesia conditions. During hypnotic analgesia the hemispheric asymmetry found in high hypnotizables was parallel to a significant reduction in the spectral mid-frequency peak of heart period variability which indicated a decrease in the level of sympathetic activity. In contrast, during hypnosis/no-analgesia the EEG amplitude reduction was not paralleled by a decrease in sympathetic activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8792204     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8760(95)00050-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  12 in total

1.  Mechanisms of hypnosis: toward the development of a biopsychosocial model.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Tomonori Adachi; Catarina Tomé-Pires; Jikwan Lee; Zubaidah Jamil Osman; Jordi Miró
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2015

2.  BIS monitor findings during self-hypnosis.

Authors:  Christopher M Burkle; Christopher J Jankowski; Laurence C Torsher; Edwin H Rho; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Change of Spectral Analysis of Fetal Heart Rate During Clinical Hypnosis: a Prospective Randomised Trial from the 20th Week of Gestation Till Term.

Authors:  J Reinhard; B R Hayes-Gill; S Schiermeier; W Hatzmann; T M Heinrich; H Hüsken-Janßen; E Herrmann; F Louwen
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Brain Oscillations, Hypnosis, and Hypnotizability.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Tomonori Adachi; Shahin Hakimian
Journal:  Am J Clin Hypn       Date:  2015

5.  Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in mind-body medicine: development of an integrative framework for psychophysiological research.

Authors:  Ann Gill Taylor; Lisa E Goehler; Daniel I Galper; Kim E Innes; Cheryl Bourguignon
Journal:  Explore (NY)       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.775

6.  The Impact of Virtual Reality Hypnosis on Pain and Anxiety Caused by Trauma: Lessons Learned from a Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Shelley A Wiechman; Mark P Jensen; Sam R Sharar; Jason K Barber; Maryam Soltani; David R Patterson
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2022-03-29

7.  Brain Oscillations and Diurnal Variations in Hypnotic Responsiveness--A Commentary on "Diurnal Variations in Hypnotic Responsiveness: Is There an Optimal Time to be Hypnotized?".

Authors:  Mark P Jensen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2016

8.  New directions in hypnosis research: strategies for advancing the cognitive and clinical neuroscience of hypnosis.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Graham A Jamieson; Antoine Lutz; Giuliana Mazzoni; William J McGeown; Enrica L Santarcangelo; Athena Demertzi; Vilfredo De Pascalis; Éva I Bányai; Christian Rominger; Patrik Vuilleumier; Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville; Devin B Terhune
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2017-04-12

9.  Cognitive modulation of psychophysical, respiratory and autonomic responses to cold pressor test.

Authors:  Enrica L Santarcangelo; Giulia Paoletti; Iacopo Chiavacci; Carlo Palombo; Giancarlo Carli; Maurizio Varanini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Why the brain knows more than we do: non-conscious representations and their role in the construction of conscious experience.

Authors:  Birgitta Dresp-Langley
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2011-12-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.