Literature DB >> 16437288

Comparison of the EEG-based SNAP index and the Bispectral (BIS) index during sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia.

P Ruiz-Gimeno1, M Soro, A Pérez-Solaz, M Carrau, F J Belda, J L Jover, G Aguilar.   

Abstract

The BIS monitor (Aspect Medical Inc, Newton, USA) was the first electroencephalogram (EEG)-based monitor of the hypnotic effect reflected by a dimensionless figure ranging from 100 (awake state) to 0 (flat line EEG). Its widespread use makes it the most-studied and the best-known among same intended devices. Its algorithm processes low-frequency EEG oscillations in order to provide the Bispectral index. A BIS index ranging from 40 to 60 has been established as the proper for surgical performance. The BIS monitor permits a closer approach to the hypnotic component of anaesthesia beyond clinical signs and may reduce the probability of intraoperative awareness; therefore, it has become a recommended monitoring tool in routine practice. The SNAP monitor (Nicolet Biomedical, Madison WI, USA) is also intended for monitoring the hypnotic effect of anaesthetics, which is in turn displayed as an index ranging from 100 to 0, with 100 meaning a fully awake state and 0 meaning no brain activity. The algorithm of the SNAP monitor is featured by its additional processing of ultra-high EEG frequencies, which seem to be involved in the formation of consciousness. The use of these frequencies would theoretically improve responsiveness during increased brain activity. We studied its behaviour patterns and capability to monitor the hypnotic effect induced by sevoflurane-nitrous oxide by comparison with the BIS index. Seventy patients ASA I-III were induced with propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium, and maintained with sevoflurane-N(2)O. BIS and SNAP indices were simultaneously recorded before induction, after intubation, after incision, at the following 10, 30 and 50 minutes, awakening and extubation time points, together with heart rate and blood pressure. The Pearson correlation was R(2) = 0.68 (p < .05). The Bland and Altman test showed a bias of 14.3 for SNAP index values with respect to BIS index values. We concluded that the SNAP index correlates with variations in the hypnotic effect induced by sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia when compared with the BIS index. In this context, a SNAP index ranging from 58 to 70 would be equivalent to the BIS index range 40 to 60 and, therefore, the accurate for surgical performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16437288     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-005-5871-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  41 in total

1.  A study of bispectral analysis and auditory evoked potential indices during propofol-induced hypnosis in volunteers: the effect of an episode of wakefulness on explicit and implicit memory.

Authors:  G Barr; R E Anderson; J G Jakobsson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  EEG bispectral index monitoring in sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia: analysis of direct costs and immediate recovery.

Authors:  A Yli-Hankala; A Vakkuri; P Annila; K Korttila
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  Effect of ketamine on bispectral index and levels of sedation.

Authors:  M Suzuki; H L Edmonds; K Tsueda; A L Malkani; C S Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane, preprogrammed propofol infusion or combined sevoflurane/propofol for laryngeal mask insertion: cardiovascular, movement and EEG bispectral index responses.

Authors:  D W Blake; M N Hogg; C H Hackman; J Pang; A R Bjorksten
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.669

5.  Reduced isoflurane consumption with bispectral index monitoring.

Authors:  B Guignard; C Coste; C Menigaux; M Chauvin
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.105

6.  Muscle relaxation does not alter hypnotic level during propofol anesthesia.

Authors:  Robert Greif; Scott Greenwald; Ekkehard Schweitzer; Sonja Laciny; Angela Rajek; James E Caldwell; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  A multicenter study of bispectral electroencephalogram analysis for monitoring anesthetic effect.

Authors:  P S Sebel; E Lang; I J Rampil; P F White; R Cork; M Jopling; N T Smith; P S Glass; P Manberg
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-Aware randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P S Myles; K Leslie; J McNeil; A Forbes; M T V Chan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Bispectral EEG index during nitrous oxide administration.

Authors:  I J Rampil; J S Kim; R Lenhardt; C Negishi; D I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  [SNAP-index and bispectral index during induction of anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil].

Authors:  G N Schmidt; T Standl; G Lankenau; A Hellstern; C Hipp; P Bischoff
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.698

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of SNAP™ II and BIS Vista indices during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass under isoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  Kinjal M Patel; Saadia S Sherwani; Paul C Fitzgerald; Robert J McCarthy
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  A comparison of SNAP II and bispectral index monitoring in patients undergoing sedation.

Authors:  S R Springman; A-C Andrei; K Willmann; D A Rusy; M E Warren; S Han; M Lee
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  SNAP II versus BIS VISTA monitor comparison during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Candace Hrelec; Erika Puente; Sergio Bergese; Roger Dzwonczyk
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  The SNAP index does not correlate with the State Behavioral Scale in intubated and sedated children.

Authors:  Cecilia Thompson; Veronika Shabanova; John S Giuliano
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.556

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.