Literature DB >> 16436920

Contrast sensitivity: determining the visual quality and function of cataract, intraocular lenses and refractive surgery.

Arthur P Ginsburg1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an update of recent advances in understanding the quality and functional significance of contrast sensitivity for the clinician regarding cataract, intraocular lenses and refractive surgery that goes beyond the measurement of visual acuity. RECENT
FINDINGS: New American National Standards Institute standards for contrast sensitivity based on linear sine-wave gratings are discussed that promise rapid advances of understanding and quantifying visual quality and function by unifying clinical results reported using contrast sensitivity. Increased sensitivity of linear sine-wave gratings over proposed bull's-eye radial gratings is discussed. Digital-image-processing software uses contrast sensitivity data to process images to help understand the quality of what the patient sees. Contrast sensitivity measurement is compared with wavefront aberrometry. Contrast sensitivity measures the total visual system quality in terms of contrast, whereas wavefront aberrometry measures the optical quality in terms of spatial distortion. Both measurements are needed to more fully understand the quality of vision.
SUMMARY: Recent advances provide the clinician with an awareness of why the new contrast-sensitivity standards are based on linear sine-wave gratings and how image-processing software can be used to better understand the quality of functional vision of the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436920     DOI: 10.1097/01.icu.0000192520.48411.fa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1040-8738            Impact factor:   3.761


  21 in total

1.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jongsoo Baek; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  TuebingenCSTest - a useful method to assess the contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Tim Schilling; Arne Ohlendorf; Alexander Leube; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Performance of a differential contrast sensitivity method to measure intraocular scattering.

Authors:  Alexandros Pennos; Harilaos Ginis; Augusto Arias; Dimitrios Christaras; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Temporal multiplexing with adaptive optics for simultaneous vision.

Authors:  Eleni Papadatou; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Iván Marín-Franch; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Contrast visual acuity after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: aspheric versus spherical design.

Authors:  Jun-Hua Li; Yi-Fan Feng; Yun-E Zhao; Yin-Ying Zhao; Lei Lin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  The prevalence of visually significant cataract in the Australian National Eye Health Survey.

Authors:  Stuart Keel; Myra B McGuiness; Joshua Foreman; Hugh R Taylor; Mohamed Dirani
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Measuring contrast sensitivity in normal subjects with OPTEC 6500: influence of age and glare.

Authors:  Bettina Hohberger; Robert Laemmer; Werner Adler; Anselm G M Juenemann; Folkert K Horn
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Normal range of cambridge low contrast test; a population based study.

Authors:  Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Akbar Fotouhi; Hassan Hashemi; Abbas Ali Yekta; Javad Heravian; Tahereh Abdolahinia; Reza Norouzi Rad; Soheila Asgari; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2014-01

9.  Clear-cornea cataract surgery: pupil size and shape changes, along with anterior chamber volume and depth changes. A Scheimpflug imaging study.

Authors:  Anastasios John Kanellopoulos; George Asimellis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-24

10.  Mapping the Contrast Sensitivity of the Visual Field With Bayesian Adaptive qVFM.

Authors:  Pengjing Xu; Luis A Lesmes; Deyue Yu; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.