Stuart Keel1,2, Myra B McGuiness3,4, Joshua Foreman3,4, Hugh R Taylor5, Mohamed Dirani3,6. 1. Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. stuart.keel@unimelb.edu.au. 2. Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. stuart.keel@unimelb.edu.au. 3. Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 4. Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 5. Indigenous Eye Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 6. Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence of visually significant cataract in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. METHODS: A total of 3098 non-Indigenous Australians aged 50 years and over and 1738 Indigenous Australians aged 40 years and over, residing in 30 randomly selected Australian sites, were examined as part of the population-based National Eye Health Survey (NEHS). For those with visual acuity worse than 6/12, photos of the anterior and posterior segment were taken with a nonmydriatic fundus camera and assessed for cataract. Visually significant cataract was assigned in eyes with best-corrected visual acuity worse than 6/12 and cataract that was determined to be the primary cause of vision loss in that eye. RESULTS: In total, 99.2% (4797/4836) participants had complete data for visual acuity and cataract assessment. The overall weighted prevalence of visually significant cataract was 2.7% (95% CI: 2.0, 3.5) in non-Indigenous Australians and 4.3% (95% CI: 3.1, 5.9) among Indigenous Australians. After adjusting for age and gender, the odds of visually significant cataract were almost three times higher among Indigenous participants compared to non-Indigenous participants (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.95, 95% CI: 2.03, 4.29). Only 54.8% of non-Indigenous Australians and 38.9% of Indigenous Australians with visually significant cataract self-reported a known history of cataract. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that continued efforts are required to build sustainable cataract surgery services within Indigenous communities. Furthermore, given the significant ageing of the Australian population, maintaining high cataract surgery rates amongst the non-Indigenous population is critical to reduce cataract-related vision loss.
PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence of visually significant cataract in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. METHODS: A total of 3098 non-Indigenous Australians aged 50 years and over and 1738 Indigenous Australians aged 40 years and over, residing in 30 randomly selected Australian sites, were examined as part of the population-based National Eye Health Survey (NEHS). For those with visual acuity worse than 6/12, photos of the anterior and posterior segment were taken with a nonmydriatic fundus camera and assessed for cataract. Visually significant cataract was assigned in eyes with best-corrected visual acuity worse than 6/12 and cataract that was determined to be the primary cause of vision loss in that eye. RESULTS: In total, 99.2% (4797/4836) participants had complete data for visual acuity and cataract assessment. The overall weighted prevalence of visually significant cataract was 2.7% (95% CI: 2.0, 3.5) in non-Indigenous Australians and 4.3% (95% CI: 3.1, 5.9) among Indigenous Australians. After adjusting for age and gender, the odds of visually significant cataract were almost three times higher among Indigenous participants compared to non-Indigenous participants (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.95, 95% CI: 2.03, 4.29). Only 54.8% of non-Indigenous Australians and 38.9% of Indigenous Australians with visually significant cataract self-reported a known history of cataract. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that continued efforts are required to build sustainable cataract surgery services within Indigenous communities. Furthermore, given the significant ageing of the Australian population, maintaining high cataract surgery rates amongst the non-Indigenous population is critical to reduce cataract-related vision loss.
Authors: Elena Rochtchina; Bickol N Mukesh; Jie Jin Wang; Cathy A McCarty; Hugh R Taylor; Paul Mitchell Journal: Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.207
Authors: Jennifer S L Tan; Jie Jin Wang; Christine Younan; Robert G Cumming; Elena Rochtchina; Paul Mitchell Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Date: 2008 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.648
Authors: Jacqueline Chua; Blanche Lim; Eva K Fenwick; Alfred Tau Liang Gan; Ava Grace Tan; Ecosse Lamoureux; Paul Mitchell; Jie Jin Wang; Tien Yin Wong; Ching-Yu Cheng Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Penny Allen; Belinda Jessup; Santosh Khanal; Victoria Baker-Smith; Kehinde Obamiro; Tony Barnett Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kehinde Obamiro; Belinda Jessup; Penny Allen; Victoria Baker-Smith; Santosh Khanal; Tony Barnett Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Lisa Keay; Kam Chun Ho; Kris Rogers; Peter McCluskey; Andrew Jr White; Nigel Morlet; Jonathon Q Ng; Ecosse Lamoureux; Konrad Pesudovs; Fiona J Stapleton; Soufiane Boufous; Jessie Huang-Lung; Anna Palagyi Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 12.776