Literature DB >> 1643685

Systolic arterial pressure determination by a new pulse monitor technique.

D T Wong1, G A Volgyesi, B Bissonnette.   

Abstract

The Doppler ultrasound (DUS) technique is a widely accepted non-invasive technique to estimate systolic blood pressure (SBP) accurately in paediatric patients. The DUS has a number of limitations. A new pulse monitor, Mr Pulse (MP), operating on the principle of a finger plethysmograph, was developed to offer an alternative technique to estimate SBP. From 104 paired SBP measurements taken in 16 paediatric patients undergoing general anaesthesia, SBP determined by the MP technique correlated closely with that by the standard DUS technique (r2 = 0.98). Analysis of degree of agreement performed indicated that there was good agreement between SBP obtained by the MP and the DUS techniques. The mean +/- standard deviation of differences in paired SBP values between the two measurement techniques was 0.55 +/- 3.59 mmHg. Mr Pulse is as accurate as the DUS technique in estimating SBP and has the advantage of less critical sensor positioning as it is not subject to electrical interference. It has no electrical hazard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1643685     DOI: 10.1007/BF03008326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  8 in total

1.  Design and evaluation of a pneumatic pulse monitor for use during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G A Volgyesi; D J Doyle; W Kucharczyk; M J Hele
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-04

2.  Comparison of blood pressure measurement by Doppler and by pulse oximetry techniques.

Authors:  C T Wallace; J D Baker; C C Alpert; S J Tankersley; J M Conroy; R E Kerns
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Direct blood pressure measurement--dynamic response requirements.

Authors:  R M Gardner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 5.  Comparison of direct and indirect measuring arterial blood pressure.

Authors:  J M Bruner; L J Krenis; J M Kunsman; A P Sherman
Journal:  Med Instrum       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb

6.  Sphygmomanometry in the pediatric patient.

Authors:  L Steinfeld; I Dimich; R Reder; M Cohen; H Alexander
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  On the safety of radial artery cannulation.

Authors:  S Slogoff; A S Keats; C Arlund
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Evaluating indirect blood pressure measurement techniques: a comparison of three systems in infants and children.

Authors:  R F Reder; I Dimich; M L Cohen; L Steinfeld
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 7.124

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.