Literature DB >> 16436826

Articular cartilage of the knee: evaluation with fluctuating equilibrium MR imaging--initial experience in healthy volunteers.

Garry E Gold1, Brian A Hargreaves, Shreyas S Vasanawala, Joshua D Webb, Ann S Shimakawa, Jean H Brittain, Christopher F Beaulieu.   

Abstract

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study, whose purpose was to prospectively compare three magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques-fluctuating equilibrium, three-dimensional (3D) spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state (SPGR), and two-dimensional (2D) fast spin echo (SE)-for evaluating articular cartilage in the knee. The study cohort consisted of 10 healthy volunteers (four men, six women; age range, 26-42 years). Cartilage signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), SNR efficiency, cartilage-fluid contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), CNR efficiency, image quality, cartilage visibility, and fat suppression were compared. Cartilage volume was compared for the fluctuating equilibrium and 3D SPGR techniques. Compared with 3D SPGR and 2D fast SE, fluctuating equilibrium yielded the highest cartilage SNR efficiency and cartilage-fluid CNR efficiency (P < .01 for both). Image quality was similar with all sequences. Fluctuating equilibrium imaging yielded higher cartilage visibility than did 2D fast SE imaging (P <. 01) but worse fat suppression than did 3D SPGR and 2D fast SE imaging (P < .04). Cartilage volume measurements with fluctuating equilibrium and 3D SPGR were similar. Fluctuating equilibrium MR imaging is a promising method for evaluating articular cartilage in the knee.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436826     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2381042183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  19 in total

1.  Volume rendering based on magnetic resonance imaging: advances in understanding the three-dimensional anatomy of the human knee.

Authors:  Giuseppe Anastasi; Placido Bramanti; Paolo Di Bella; Angelo Favaloro; Fabio Trimarchi; Ludovico Magaudda; Michele Gaeta; Emanuele Scribano; Daniele Bruschetta; Demetrio Milardi
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Three-dimensional volume rendering of the ankle based on magnetic resonance images enables the generation of images comparable to real anatomy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Anastasi; Giuseppina Cutroneo; Daniele Bruschetta; Fabio Trimarchi; Giuseppe Ielitro; Simona Cammaroto; Antonio Duca; Placido Bramanti; Angelo Favaloro; Gianluigi Vaccarino; Demetrio Milardi
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Imaging of temporomandibular joint: approach by direct volume rendering.

Authors:  Antonino Marco Cuccia; Carola Caradonna; Daniele Bruschetta; Gianluigi Vaccarino; Demetrio Milardi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-11-20

4.  Accuracy of 3D cartilage models generated from MR images is dependent on cartilage thickness: laser scanner based validation of in vivo cartilage.

Authors:  Seungbum Koo; Nicholas J Giori; Garry E Gold; Chris O Dyrby; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 5.  Routine 3D magnetic resonance imaging of joints.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Cartilage morphology at 3.0T: assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging techniques.

Authors:  Christina A Chen; Richard Kijowski; Lauren M Shapiro; Michael J Tuite; Kirkland W Davis; Jessica L Klaers; Walter F Block; Scott B Reeder; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Rapid isotropic resolution cartilage assessment using radial alternating repetition time balanced steady-state free-precession imaging.

Authors:  Habib Al saleh; Larry Hernandez; Kenneth S Lee; Humberto G Rosas; Walter F Block; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Cartilage imaging at 3.0T with gradient refocused acquisition in the steady-state (GRASS) and IDEAL fat-water separation.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Michael Tuite; Leo Passov; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Huanzhou Hu; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Recent advances in MRI of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Garry E Gold; Christina A Chen; Seungbum Koo; Brian A Hargreaves; Neal K Bangerter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Cartilage thickness: factors influencing multidetector CT measurements in a phantom study.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.