Literature DB >> 16436158

The development of picture cards and their use in ascertaining characteristics of Chinese surgical patients' decision-making preferences.

Amanda Henderson1, David Shum, Wai-Tong Chien.   

Abstract

AIM: This exploratory pilot study developed and tested the validity of picture cards as a strategy to ascertain patients' desired participation in decision making. These were then used to ascertain characteristics of Hong Kong Chinese patients' decision-making preferences for surgery. VALIDATION OF TOOL: Two sets of analyses tested the validity of picture cards in an Australian and Hong Kong Chinese population. First, the ratings of the two groups of participants using the picture cards for three scenarios (severe, moderate and mild medical conditions) were correlated with mean ratings of three decision-making subscales of a self-report questionnaire for the three scenarios. Second, a 3 (Scenario) x 2 (Ethnic Group) mixed anova examined whether the picture cards are sensitive to differences relating to severity of medical conditions and ethnicity. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of initially 35 Hong Kong and 24 Australian patients was used to validate the picture card tool. A convenience sample of a further 186 Hong Kong Chinese surgical inpatients used the tool.
DESIGN: Participants selected the picture card that best represented their decision-making preference. MAIN VARIABLES: Demographic factors, prior knowledge, nature of surgery and preference for participation in decision making.
RESULTS: Significant correlations were made between the questionnaire and the picture card tool. Using the tool, a significant difference was found between males' and females' decision-making preference, yet, no significant difference was found with respect to type or previous surgical operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436158      PMCID: PMC5060329          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00360.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  26 in total

1.  A new model of medical decisions: exploring the limits of shared decision making.

Authors:  Simon N Whitney
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Body language.

Authors:  D Findlay
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  1987-03

4.  Preferences for involvement in medical decision-making: situational and demographic influences.

Authors:  S C Thompson; J S Pitts; L Schwankovsky
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1993-12-31

Review 5.  Research in peri-operative nursing care.

Authors:  T Leinonen; H Leino-Kilpi
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  How older patients' treatment preferences are influenced by disclosures about therapeutic uncertainty: surgery versus expectant management for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  D J Mazur; J F Merz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Effect of preoperative instruction on postoperative outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Hathaway
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 8.  Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys.

Authors:  J Benbassat; D Pilpel; M Tidhar
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.104

9.  Decision-making preferences towards surgical intervention in a Hong Kong Chinese population.

Authors:  A Henderson; D Shum
Journal:  Int Nurs Rev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.871

10.  Patients' autonomy in surgical care: a comparison of nurses' perceptions in five European countries.

Authors:  R Suhonen; M Välimäki; T Dassen; M Gasull; C Lemonidou; P A Scott; A Kaljonen; M Arndt; H Leino-Kilpi
Journal:  Int Nurs Rev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.871

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.

Authors:  Laura A Shinkunas; Caleb J Klipowicz; Erica M Carlisle
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.796

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.