BACKGROUND: Although the published literature on alcohol beverage taxes, prices, sales, and related problems treats alcoholic beverages as a simple good, alcohol is a complex good composed of different beverage types (i.e., beer, wine, and spirits) and quality brands (e.g., high-, medium-, and low-quality beers). As a complex good, consumers may make substitutions between purchases of different beverage types and brands in response to price increases. For this reason, the availability of a broad range of beverage prices provides opportunities for consumers to mitigate the effects of average price increases through quality substitutions; a change in beverage choice in response to price increases to maintain consumption. METHODS: Using Swedish price and sales data provided by Systembolaget for the years 1984 through 1994, this study assessed the relationships between alcohol beverage prices, beverage quality, and alcohol sales. The study examined price effects on alcohol consumption using seemingly unrelated regression equations to model the impacts of price increases within 9 empirically defined quality classes across beverage types. The models enabled statistical assessments of both own-price and cross-price effects between types and classes. RESULTS: The results of these analyses showed that consumers respond to price increases by altering their total consumption and by varying their brand choices. Significant reductions in sales were observed in response to price increases, but these effects were mitigated by significant substitutions between quality classes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the net impacts of purposeful price policy to reduce consumption will depend on how such policies affect the range of prices across beverage brands.
BACKGROUND: Although the published literature on alcohol beverage taxes, prices, sales, and related problems treats alcoholic beverages as a simple good, alcohol is a complex good composed of different beverage types (i.e., beer, wine, and spirits) and quality brands (e.g., high-, medium-, and low-quality beers). As a complex good, consumers may make substitutions between purchases of different beverage types and brands in response to price increases. For this reason, the availability of a broad range of beverage prices provides opportunities for consumers to mitigate the effects of average price increases through quality substitutions; a change in beverage choice in response to price increases to maintain consumption. METHODS: Using Swedish price and sales data provided by Systembolaget for the years 1984 through 1994, this study assessed the relationships between alcohol beverage prices, beverage quality, and alcohol sales. The study examined price effects on alcohol consumption using seemingly unrelated regression equations to model the impacts of price increases within 9 empirically defined quality classes across beverage types. The models enabled statistical assessments of both own-price and cross-price effects between types and classes. RESULTS: The results of these analyses showed that consumers respond to price increases by altering their total consumption and by varying their brand choices. Significant reductions in sales were observed in response to price increases, but these effects were mitigated by significant substitutions between quality classes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the net impacts of purposeful price policy to reduce consumption will depend on how such policies affect the range of prices across beverage brands.
Authors: Tim Stockwell; Samuel Churchill; Adam Sherk; Justin Sorge; Paul Gruenewald Journal: Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tim Stockwell; Jinhui Zhao; Norman Giesbrecht; Scott Macdonald; Gerald Thomas; Ashley Wettlaufer Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-10-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Tim Stockwell; Jinhui Zhao; Gina Martin; Scott Macdonald; Kate Vallance; Andrew Treno; William Ponicki; Andrew Tu; Jane Buxton Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Marie-Claude Lavoie; Patricia Langenberg; Andres Villaveces; Patricia C Dischinger; Linda Simoni-Wastila; Kathleen Hoke; Gordon S Smith Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Alison B Albers; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Michael Siegel; David H Jernigan Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Andrew J Treno; William R Ponicki; Tim Stockwell; Scott Macdonald; Paul J Gruenewald; Jinhui Zhao; Gina Martin; Alissa Greer Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 3.455