OBJECTIVES: We report impacts on alcohol consumption following new and increased minimum alcohol prices in Saskatchewan, Canada. METHODS: We conducted autoregressive integrated moving average time series analyses of alcohol sales and price data from the Saskatchewan government alcohol monopoly for 26 periods before and 26 periods after the intervention. RESULTS: A 10% increase in minimum prices significantly reduced consumption of beer by 10.06%, spirits by 5.87%, wine by 4.58%, and all beverages combined by 8.43%. Consumption of coolers decreased significantly by 13.2%, cocktails by 21.3%, and liqueurs by 5.3%. There were larger effects for purely off-premise sales (e.g., liquor stores) than for primarily on-premise sales (e.g., bars, restaurants). Consumption of higher strength beer and wine declined the most. A 10% increase in minimum price was associated with a 22.0% decrease in consumption of higher strength beer (> 6.5% alcohol/volume) versus 8.17% for lower strength beers. The neighboring province of Alberta showed no change in per capita alcohol consumption before and after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Minimum pricing is a promising strategy for reducing the public health burden associated with hazardous alcohol consumption. Pricing to reflect percentage alcohol content of drinks can shift consumption toward lower alcohol content beverage types.
OBJECTIVES: We report impacts on alcohol consumption following new and increased minimum alcohol prices in Saskatchewan, Canada. METHODS: We conducted autoregressive integrated moving average time series analyses of alcohol sales and price data from the Saskatchewan government alcohol monopoly for 26 periods before and 26 periods after the intervention. RESULTS: A 10% increase in minimum prices significantly reduced consumption of beer by 10.06%, spirits by 5.87%, wine by 4.58%, and all beverages combined by 8.43%. Consumption of coolers decreased significantly by 13.2%, cocktails by 21.3%, and liqueurs by 5.3%. There were larger effects for purely off-premise sales (e.g., liquor stores) than for primarily on-premise sales (e.g., bars, restaurants). Consumption of higher strength beer and wine declined the most. A 10% increase in minimum price was associated with a 22.0% decrease in consumption of higher strength beer (> 6.5% alcohol/volume) versus 8.17% for lower strength beers. The neighboring province of Alberta showed no change in per capita alcohol consumption before and after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Minimum pricing is a promising strategy for reducing the public health burden associated with hazardous alcohol consumption. Pricing to reflect percentage alcohol content of drinks can shift consumption toward lower alcohol content beverage types.
Authors: Jürgen Rehm; Andriy V Samokhvalov; Manuela G Neuman; Robin Room; Charles Parry; Knut Lönnroth; Jayadeep Patra; Vladimir Poznyak; Svetlana Popova Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-12-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Tim Stockwell; Samuel Churchill; Adam Sherk; Justin Sorge; Paul Gruenewald Journal: Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tim Stockwell; Jinhui Zhao; Gina Martin; Scott Macdonald; Kate Vallance; Andrew Treno; William Ponicki; Andrew Tu; Jane Buxton Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Rosalie Liccardo Pacula; Beau Kilmer; Alexander C Wagenaar; Frank J Chaloupka; Jonathan P Caulkins Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mark S Kaplan; Nathalie Huguet; Raul Caetano; Norman Giesbrecht; William C Kerr; Bentson H McFarland Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Erin K Fortunato; Michael Siegel; Rebecca L Ramirez; Craig Ross; William DeJong; Alison B Albers; David H Jernigan Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 3.829