Literature DB >> 16432655

Usefulness of a virtual reality simulator or training box for endoscopic surgery training.

T Kimura1, A Kawabe, K Suzuki, H Wada.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether the use of a simulator for endoscopic surgery training improves the performance of actual operations. For the study, 16 medical students were divided into three groups: a virtual reality (VR) simulator group (n = 6), a training box (TB) group (n = 6), and a control group (n = 4). The VR and TB groups received 2 h of training per day for 5 days, after which they were requested to perform intestinal dissection, to close a gastric perforation, and to perform cholecystectomy in pigs. Performance was assessed on the basis of the operating time and the error score. Although there were no differences between the three groups in terms of the total operating time or error score, the VR and TB groups required less time for closure of the gastric perforation than the control group. In addition, the operating time decreased as actual operating experience increased in the VR group. In the TB group, the time for closure of a gastric perforation was shorter when the supervisor had seen the operation before training. These findings demonstrated that a simulator is useful for acquiring psychomotor skills, but does not immediately enable clinical performance of an operation. More actual experience and good supervision are essential for increasing the effectiveness of training with the VR and TB simulators, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16432655     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0190-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room.

Authors:  A Hyltander; E Liljegren; P H Rhodin; H Lönroth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Does training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance?

Authors:  G Ahlberg; T Heikkinen; L Iselius; C-E Leijonmarck; J Rutqvist; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Validation and learning in the Procedicus KSA virtual reality surgical simulator.

Authors:  P Ström; A Kjellin; L Hedman; E Johnson; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other?

Authors:  Y Munz; B D Kumar; K Moorthy; S Bann; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Shannon A Fraser; Donna Stanbridge; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Christopher G Andrew
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps.

Authors:  R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  N Taffinder; C Sutton; R J Fishwick; I C McManus; A Darzi
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1998

10.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; V B Kristiansen; J Bendix; L Bardram; J Rosenberg; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Nonsurgical skills do not predict baseline scores in inanimate box or virtual-reality trainers.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; Jason L Harper; Constantine T Frantzides; David S Tichansky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact on laboratory training in subsequent performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Toshihiko Shinohara; Tetsuji Fujita; Takeyuki Misawa; Taro Sakamoto; Kazuhiko Yoshida; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a new educational model using specially embalmed human anatomical specimen.

Authors:  Juliette C Slieker; Hilco P Theeuwes; Göran L van Rooijen; Johan F Lange; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.