Tatsuo Endo1, Werner J Finger. 1. Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of stone dies produced from standardized impressions with 1 new and 1 conventional polyether impression material and a polyvinyl siloxane reference material. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Impressions with the polyether materials P2 and Impregum and with the polyvinyl siloxane Flexitime were produced at 23 degrees C or 37 degrees C from a truncated steel cone in cylindrical steel trays giving 4-mm impression layer thickness at the prominence line. Stone dies were poured after 1 or 24 hours of storage at ambient atmosphere. Additional impressions were stored at different relative humidity levels (0%, 33%, 50%, 75%, or 100%) for 24 hours prior to die pouring. The accuracy of the stone dies was determined as axial discrepancy between a steel ring, which fit perfectly on the steel die and the occlusal die surface. The base-diameter deviation (deltad) was calculated. RESULTS: After 1 hour, a similar increase in deltad was noticed for impression materials when dies were poured at impression temperature. Impressions made at 37 degrees C exhibited significantly higher deltad than at 23 degrees C. Light-bodied P2 showed the highest deltad increase when dies were poured after 24 hours. Flexitime showed moderate deltad differences at the 2 pouring times. The deltad of dies made from polyether materials decreased significantly with increasing humidity, whereas polyvinyl siloxane was not adversely affected. CONCLUSION: The dimensional accuracy of P2 is comparable to that of the conventional polyether impression material after short-term storage. Polyethers may absorb water, significantly compromising die accuracy upon storage at high humidity.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of stone dies produced from standardized impressions with 1 new and 1 conventional polyether impression material and a polyvinyl siloxane reference material. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Impressions with the polyether materials P2 and Impregum and with the polyvinyl siloxane Flexitime were produced at 23 degrees C or 37 degrees C from a truncated steel cone in cylindrical steel trays giving 4-mm impression layer thickness at the prominence line. Stone dies were poured after 1 or 24 hours of storage at ambient atmosphere. Additional impressions were stored at different relative humidity levels (0%, 33%, 50%, 75%, or 100%) for 24 hours prior to die pouring. The accuracy of the stone dies was determined as axial discrepancy between a steel ring, which fit perfectly on the steel die and the occlusal die surface. The base-diameter deviation (deltad) was calculated. RESULTS: After 1 hour, a similar increase in deltad was noticed for impression materials when dies were poured at impression temperature. Impressions made at 37 degrees C exhibited significantly higher deltad than at 23 degrees C. Light-bodied P2 showed the highest deltad increase when dies were poured after 24 hours. Flexitime showed moderate deltad differences at the 2 pouring times. The deltad of dies made from polyether materials decreased significantly with increasing humidity, whereas polyvinyl siloxane was not adversely affected. CONCLUSION: The dimensional accuracy of P2 is comparable to that of the conventional polyether impression material after short-term storage. Polyethers may absorb water, significantly compromising die accuracy upon storage at high humidity.
Authors: Sebastian B M Patzelt; Archontia Emmanouilidi; Susanne Stampf; Joerg R Strub; Wael Att Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2013-11-17 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Luciana Martinelli Santayana de Lima; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Luiz Henrique Burnett Junior; Ana Maria Spohr Journal: J Int Oral Health Date: 2014-06-26
Authors: Stefanie Steinhäuser-Andresen; Andreas Detterbeck; Christoph Funk; Michael Krumm; Stefan Kasperl; Alexandra Holst; Ursula Hirschfelder Journal: J Orofac Orthop Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 1.938