Literature DB >> 16421753

A new ambulatory system for comparative evaluation of the three-dimensional knee kinematics, applied to anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

J Favre1, F Luthi, B M Jolles, O Siegrist, B Najafi, K Aminian.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop an ambulatory system for the three-dimensional (3D) knee kinematics evaluation, which can be used outside a laboratory during long-term monitoring. In order to show the efficacy of this ambulatory system, knee function was analysed using this system, after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) lesion, and after reconstructive surgery. The proposed system was composed of two 3D gyroscopes, fixed on the shank and on the thigh, and a portable data logger for signal recording. The measured parameters were the 3D mean range of motion (ROM) and the healthy knee was used as control. The precision of this system was first assessed using an ultrasound reference system. The repeatability was also estimated. A clinical study was then performed on five unilateral ACL-deficient men (range: 19-36 years) prior to, and a year after the surgery. The patients were evaluated with the IKDC score and the kinematics measurements were carried out on a 30 m walking trial. The precision in comparison with the reference system was 4.4 degrees , 2.7 degrees and 4.2 degrees for flexion-extension, internal-external rotation, and abduction-adduction, respectively. The repeatability of the results for the three directions was 0.8 degrees , 0.7 degrees and 1.8 degrees . The averaged ROM of the five patients' healthy knee were 70.1 degrees (standard deviation (SD) 5.8 degrees), 24.0 degrees (SD 3.0 degrees) and 12.0 degrees (SD 6.3 degrees for flexion-extension, internal-external rotation and abduction-adduction before surgery, and 76.5 degrees (SD 4.1 degrees), 21.7 degrees (SD 4.9 degrees) and 10.2 degrees (SD 4.6 degrees) 1 year following the reconstruction. The results for the pathologic knee were 64.5 degrees (SD 6.9 degrees), 20.6 degrees (SD 4.0 degrees) and 19.7 degrees (8.2 degrees) during the first evaluation, and 72.3 degrees (SD 2.4 degrees), 25.8 degrees (SD 6.4 degrees) and 12.4 degrees (SD 2.3 degrees) during the second one. The performance of the system enabled us to detect knee function modifications in the sagittal and transverse plane. Prior to the reconstruction, the ROM of the injured knee was lower in flexion-extension and internal-external rotation in comparison with the controlateral knee. One year after the surgery, four patients were classified normal (A) and one almost normal (B), according to the IKDC score, and changes in the kinematics of the five patients remained: lower flexion-extension ROM and higher internal-external rotation ROM in comparison with the controlateral knee. The 3D kinematics was changed after an ACL lesion and remained altered one year after the surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16421753     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-005-0023-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  49 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of operative or nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture--is sports activity a determining variable?

Authors:  C Fink; C Hoser; W Hackl; R A Navarro; K P Benedetto
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems.

Authors:  Ruth E Mayagoitia; Anand V Nene; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Quantitative comparison of three different types of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction methods: laxity and 3-D kinematic measurements.

Authors:  Nicola Hagemeister; Raymond Long; L'Hocine Yahia; Nicolas Duval; Wilfried Krudwig; Ulrich Witzel; Jacques A de Guise
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.300

4.  Kinematics and laxity of the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: pre- and postoperative radiostereometric studies.

Authors:  Sveinbjörn Brandsson; Jon Karlsson; Leif Swärd; Jüri Kartus; Bengt I Eriksson; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Comparison of different calculations of three-dimensional joint kinematics from video-based system data.

Authors:  L Chéze
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Femoral anatomical frame: assessment of various definitions.

Authors:  U Della Croce; V Camomilla; A Leardini; A Cappozzo
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  A new approach to accurate measurement of uniaxial joint angles based on a combination of accelerometers and gyroscopes.

Authors:  Hooman Dejnabadi; Brigitte M Jolles; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  On the estimation of joint kinematics during gait.

Authors:  H K Ramakrishnan; M P Kadaba
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Helical motion analysis of the knee--II. Kinematics of uninjured and injured knees during walking and pivoting.

Authors:  R Shiavi; T Limbird; M Frazer; K Stivers; A Strauss; J Abramovitz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  The relationship between isokinetic quadriceps strength and laxity on gait analysis parameters in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees.

Authors:  Alli Gokeler; Thomas Schmalz; Elmar Knopf; Jürgen Freiwald; Siegmar Blumentritt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  14 in total

1.  Golfing skill level postural control differences: a brief report.

Authors:  James S Wrobel; Samuel Marclay; Bijan Najafi
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Static rotational knee laxity in anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Daniel Theisen; Dietrich Pape; Christian Nührenbörger; Romain Seil
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Assessing postural control and postural control strategy in diabetes patients using innovative and wearable technology.

Authors:  Bijan Najafi; Deena Horn; Samuel Marclay; Ryan T Crews; Stephanie Wu; James S Wrobel
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

Review 4.  The use of wearable inertial motion sensors in human lower limb biomechanics studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Yue-Yan Chan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Physical Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Ferhat Attal; Samer Mohammed; Mariam Dedabrishvili; Faicel Chamroukhi; Latifa Oukhellou; Yacine Amirat
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Method for Estimating Three-Dimensional Knee Rotations Using Two Inertial Measurement Units: Validation with a Coordinate Measurement Machine.

Authors:  Rachel V Vitali; Stephen M Cain; Ryan S McGinnis; Antonia M Zaferiou; Lauro V Ojeda; Steven P Davidson; Noel C Perkins
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-27       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Survey of Motion Tracking Methods Based on Inertial Sensors: A Focus on Upper Limb Human Motion.

Authors:  Alessandro Filippeschi; Norbert Schmitz; Markus Miezal; Gabriele Bleser; Emanuele Ruffaldi; Didier Stricker
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Mobile Sensor Application for Kinematic Detection of the Knees.

Authors:  Tossaphon Jaysrichai; Areerat Suputtitada; Watcharapong Khovidhungij
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-08-25

9.  IMU-based joint angle measurement for gait analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Seel; Jörg Raisch; Thomas Schauer
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Clinical evaluation of a mobile sensor-based gait analysis method for outcome measurement after knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tilman Calliess; Raphael Bocklage; Roman Karkosch; Michael Marschollek; Henning Windhagen; Mareike Schulze
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.