Literature DB >> 12711241

Femoral anatomical frame: assessment of various definitions.

U Della Croce1, V Camomilla, A Leardini, A Cappozzo.   

Abstract

The reliability of the estimate of joint kinematic variables and the relevant functional interpretation are affected by the uncertainty with which bony anatomical landmarks and underlying bony segment anatomical frames are determined. When a stereo-photogrammetric system is used for in vivo studies, minimising and compensating for this uncertainty is crucial. This paper deals with the propagation of the errors associated with the location of both internal and palpable femoral anatomical landmarks to the estimation of the orientation of the femoral anatomical frame and to the knee joint angles during movement. Given eight anatomical landmarks, and the precision with which they can be identified experimentally, 12 different rules were defined for the construction of the anatomical frame and submitted to comparative assessment. Results showed that using more than three landmarks allows for more repeatable anatomical frame orientation and knee joint kinematics estimation. Novel rules are proposed that use optimization algorithms. On the average, the femoral frame orientation dispersion had a standard deviation of 2, 2.5 and 1.5 degrees for the frontal, transverse, and sagittal plane, respectively. However, a proper choice of the relevant construction rule allowed for a reduction of these inaccuracies in selected planes to 1 degrees rms. The dispersion of the knee adduction-abduction and internal-external rotation angles could also be limited to 1 degrees rms irrespective of the flexion angle value.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12711241     DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(03)00032-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  7 in total

1.  A local reference frame for describing the proximal human femur: application in clinical settings.

Authors:  Milad Masjedi; Charison Tay; Simon J Harris; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Reliable femoral frame construction based on MRI dedicated to muscles position follow-up.

Authors:  G Dubois; D Bonneau; V Lafage; P Rouch; W Skalli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  A new ambulatory system for comparative evaluation of the three-dimensional knee kinematics, applied to anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  J Favre; F Luthi; B M Jolles; O Siegrist; B Najafi; K Aminian
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The use of the greater trochanter marker in the thigh segment model: implications for hip and knee frontal and transverse plane motion.

Authors:  Valentina Graci; Gretchen Salsich
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.179

5.  Measurement and Analysis of Gait Pattern during Stair Walk for Improvement of Robotic Locomotion Rehabilitation System.

Authors:  Sang-Eun Park; Ye-Ji Ho; Min Ho Chun; Jaesoon Choi; Youngjin Moon
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 1.781

6.  Reconstruction of skeletal movement using skin markers: comparative assessment of bone pose estimators.

Authors:  Andrea Cereatti; Ugo Della Croce; Aurelio Cappozzo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Cross-talk correction method for knee kinematics in gait analysis using principal component analysis (PCA): a new proposal.

Authors:  Audrey Baudet; Claire Morisset; Philippe d'Athis; Jean-Francis Maillefert; Jean-Marie Casillas; Paul Ornetti; Davy Laroche
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.