Literature DB >> 26463715

Novel modification of voice prosthesis.

Basel Al Kadah1, George Papaspyrou2, Mathias Schneider3, Bernhard Schick2.   

Abstract

The undesired dilatation of the tracheooesophageal shunt after surgical implantation of voice prosthesis is a typical complication of this procedure. Temporary removal of the prosthesis and reinsertion after a short period of time is a first-line therapeutical option aiming shrinkage of the shunt. Failure of this measure generally is an indication of revision surgery. We present first experiences treating leakage problems with novel modified voice prosthesis without surgical intervention in specified cases. 11 patients (1 female, 10 male) aging between 51 and 71 years were presented with shunt leakage between 11/2008 and 11/2012 in the ENT-Department of the University Hospital of Homburg/Saar after a custom built voice prosthesis had been used initially successfully. A "Provox 2"(®) voice prosthesis was modified with two discs made of silicone each on the tracheal and oesophageal side and additionally reinforcing the diameter of the prosthesis by a silicone tube. The modified prosthesis was inserted in a retrograde way under general anesthesia, analogical to the approach used with the "Provox 1"(®)-prosthesis. The period of observation ranged between 12 and 48 months. As a measure of control swallowing of methylene blue was used. In all cases leakage suspended. Durability of the modified prosthesis ranged between 2 and 6 months. Neither the patients' complained about, nor did the physicians notice subjectively an impairment of the voice quality. Modifications of "Provox 2"(®)-prosthesis should be regarded in individual cases and constitute a reasonable alternative to revision surgery. A surgical approach is more intricate and costly, more taxing for the patient and susceptible to failure. We regard the necessity of general anesthesia for the insertion of the modified prosthesis as a disadvantage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fistula leakage; Laryngectomy; Modified voice prosthesis esophago-tracheal fistula; Novel modification; Shunt leakage; Voice prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26463715     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3795-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  41 in total

1.  Does prosthesis diameter matter? The relationship between voice prosthesis diameter and complications.

Authors:  Heather M Starmer; Nishant Agrawal; Wayne Koch; Jeremy Richmon; Kimberly Webster; Christine G Gourin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  [Dislocation of voice prostheses. Interdisciplinary management of diagnostics and treatment].

Authors:  S Birk; P Michaeli; M Kapsreiter; C Alexiou
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Secondary surgical voice rehabilitation].

Authors:  I F Herrmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Prosthetic vocal rehabilitation following laryngectomy. The voice button.

Authors:  W R Panje
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  [Closure of esotracheal fistula after phonation implants. Technique and results of tracheal ascension].

Authors:  J P Bessede; F Bories; M Enaux; S Orsel; J P Sauvage
Journal:  Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac       Date:  1995

6.  Autologous fat injection to treat leakage around tracheoesophageal puncture.

Authors:  Sophie Périé; Xie Ming; Eddy Dewolf; Jean Lacau St Guily
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  The management of periprosthetic leakage in the presence of supra-oesophageal reflux after prosthetic voice rehabilitation.

Authors:  Kai J Lorenz; L Grieser; T Ehrhart; H Maier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Role of reflux in tracheoesophageal fistula problems after laryngectomy.

Authors:  Kai J Lorenz; Laura Grieser; Theresa Ehrhart; Heinz Maier
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  The Groningen, Nijdam and Provox voice prostheses: a prospective clinical comparison based on 845 replacements.

Authors:  F J Van Den Hoogen; M J Oudes; G Hombergen; H F Nijdam; J J Manni
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  [Coincidence of fistula enlargement and supra-oesophageal reflux in patients after laryngectomy and prosthetic voice restoration].

Authors:  K J Lorenz; T Ehrhart; L Grieser; H Maier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.