Literature DB >> 16418628

Allograft versus no graft with a posterior multisegmented hook system for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.

Randal R Betz1, Anthony M Petrizzo, Paul J Kerner, Stephen P Falatyn, David H Clements, Gail K Huss.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical results of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with allograft augmentation versus no graft for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of allograft has become a standard means of augmenting a PSF. Many studies have shown equal rates of fusion when comparing allograft with autogenous iliac crest. There have been no studies to directly compare the results obtained with allograft with those achieved without the use of any bone graft at all.
METHODS: Ninety-one patients with AIS were randomized into two treatment groups. Seventy-six patients had greater than 2-year follow-up and are included in this review. The Allograft Group consisted of 37 patients who underwent a standard PSF using a multisegmented hook-screw and rod system with the use of corticocancellous allograft for augmentation. The No Graft Group included 39 patients with AIS who underwent the same procedure without any bone graft. All autogenous bone resulting from a thoracoplasty and any local bone (for example, that removed from spinous processes) was discarded in both groups. Patients with at least 2 years of radiographic and clinical follow-up were evaluated using established criteria for possible or definite pseudarthrosis. Treatment groups were similar with respect to age, preoperative deformity, and correction obtained.
RESULTS: The overall definitive pseudarthrosis rate for this study was 1.3% (1 of 76 patients). The 1 patient with pseudarthrosis was in the Allograft Group (1 of 37, or 2.7%, P = 0.98 as defined by our criteria), versus none of 39 in the No Graft Group. Two patients in each group (5.4% in the Allograft Group and 5.1% in the No Graft Group) met the radiographic criteria for possible pseudarthrosis. This establishes a P value of 0.65 comparing risk of possible pseudarthrosis in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a PSF using newer-generation multisegmented hook-screw and rod systems can be successful with allograft and/or local bonegraft without the use of supplemental autogenous bone graft (from the iliac crest or ribs) in patients with AIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16418628     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000194771.49774.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Bone substitutes in scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  T Lerner; H Griefingholt; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Genetically modified mesenchymal stem cells induce mechanically stable posterior spine fusion.

Authors:  Dima Sheyn; Martin Rüthemann; Olga Mizrahi; Ilan Kallai; Yoram Zilberman; Wafa Tawackoli; Linda E A Kanim; Li Zhao; Hyun Bae; Gadi Pelled; Jess G Snedeker; Dan Gazit
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Bone substitutes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using sublaminar bands: is it useful? A case-control study.

Authors:  Sebastien Pesenti; Soufiane Ghailane; Jeffrey J Varghese; Matthieu Ollivier; Emilie Peltier; Elie Choufani; Gerard Bollini; Benjamin Blondel; Jean-Luc Jouve
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Use of graft materials and biologics in spine deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Ki-Eun Chang; Mohamed Kamal Mesregah; Zoe Fresquez; Eloise W Stanton; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-23

5.  Bovine-derived xenograft is a viable bone graft substitute in multilevel, instrumented, spinal fusion.

Authors:  Max Prost; Jochaim Windolf; Markus Rafael Konieczny
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-25

6.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with segmental pedicle screws and combined local autograft and allograft bone for spinal fusion: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Xiaoming Yang; Hongguang Xu; Ming Li; Suxi Gu; Xiutong Fang; Jingjie Wang; Jianqiang Ni; Dajiang Wu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  A level-1 pilot study to evaluate of ultraporous beta-tricalcium phosphate as a graft extender in the posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Thomas Lerner; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte; Marc Schneider; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Silicate-substituted calcium phosphate as a bone graft substitute in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Thomas Lerner; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Current concepts and controversies on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Part I.

Authors:  Alok Sud; Athanasios I Tsirikos
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis - to operate or not? A debate article.

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Shay Bess; Man Sang Wong; Vikas Patel; Deborah Goodall; Evalina Burger
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2008-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.