Literature DB >> 16418465

Surveillance for recurrent bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay.

H Barton Grossman1, Mark Soloway, Edward Messing, Giora Katz, Barry Stein, Vahan Kassabian, Yu Shen.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: At least 50% of patients with a history of bladder cancer have recurrences, so rigorous surveillance is necessary. Cystoscopy is standard but can fail to detect some bladder cancers, so a urine test is frequently part of the evaluation.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a point-of-care proteomic test that measures the nuclear matrix protein NMP22 in voided urine could improve detection of recurrence during monitoring of patients with a history of bladder cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: From September 2001 to February 2002, 23 academic, private practice, and hospital facilities in 9 US states prospectively enrolled 668 consecutive patients with a history of bladder cancer in this cross-sectional study. Patients provided a voided urine sample for analysis of NMP22 protein and cytology prior to cystoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnosis of bladder cancer recurrence, based on cystoscopy with biopsy, was accepted as the reference standard. The performance of the NMP22 test was compared with voided urine cytology as an aid to detection. Testing for the NMP22 tumor marker was conducted in a blinded manner.
RESULTS: Bladder cancer was diagnosed in 103 patients. Cystoscopy alone identified 91.3% of the cancers (94/103; 95% confidence interval [CI], 84.1%-95.9%). The combination of cystoscopy with the NMP22 assay detected 99.0% of the malignancies (102/103; 95% CI, 94.7%-100%; P = .005). The NMP22 assay detected 8 of 9 cancers that were not visualized during initial cystoscopy, including 7 that were high-grade. The sensitivity and specificity of the NMP22 test alone were 49.5% (51/103; 95% CI, 39.5%-59.5%) and 87.3% (493/565; 95% CI, 84.2%-89.9%), respectively. Voided cytology detected only 3 of the malignancies missed during initial cystoscopy and did not significantly increase the sensitivity of cystoscopy (94.2%; 95% CI, 87.7%-97.8%; P = .08).
CONCLUSION: The noninvasive point-of-care assay for elevated urinary NMP22 protein can increase the ability to detect recurrent bladder cancer, with test results available during the patient visit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16418465     DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.3.299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  57 in total

1.  [Molecular markers in the diagnostics and therapy of urothelial cancer].

Authors:  C Protzel; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Urine collection and processing for protein biomarker discovery and quantification.

Authors:  C Eric Thomas; Wade Sexton; Kaaron Benson; Rebecca Sutphen; John Koomen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Considerations on the use of diagnostic markers in management of patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Piyush K Agarwal; Peter C Black; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Current Use and Promise of Urinary Markers for Urothelial Cancer.

Authors:  William Tabayoyong; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  In the cystoscopic follow-up of non-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma, NMP-22 works for high grades, but unreliable in low grades and upper urinary tract tumors.

Authors:  Enis Coskuner; Ibrahim Cevik; Alp Ozkan; Ozdal Dillioglugil; Atıf Akdas
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  NMP22 is predictive of recurrence in high-risk superficial bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Paul Lau; Joseph L Chin; Stephen Pautler; Hassan Razvi; Jonathan I Izawa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Critical evaluation of urinary markers for bladder cancer detection and monitoring.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Jose A Karam; Yair Lotan; Pierre I Karakiewizc
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

8.  Clinical significance of urine heparanase in bladder cancer progression.

Authors:  Itay Shafat; Dov Pode; Tamar Peretz; Neta Ilan; Israel Vlodavsky; Benjamin Nisman
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 9.  Bladder tumor markers: from hematuria to molecular diagnostics--where do we stand?

Authors:  Samir P Shirodkar; Vinata B Lokeshwar
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.512

10.  [Secondary prevention after urological tumor diseases. Focusing on the kidneys, testes, and bladder].

Authors:  M J Mathers; D A Lazica; T Klotz; F Sommer; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.