Literature DB >> 18092171

Considerations on the use of diagnostic markers in management of patients with bladder cancer.

Piyush K Agarwal1, Peter C Black, Ashish M Kamat.   

Abstract

Although the incidence of bladder cancer lags behind that of other malignancies, it has the highest rate of recurrence among all US malignancies. The propensity to recur and the possibility of disease progression require aggressive surveillance, which has led to bladder cancer being the most expensive malignancy to treat in the United States. Current non-tailored surveillance strategies applied uniformly to all patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer may impose excessive diagnostic burden on patients with low-grade disease for the sake of adequately monitoring those with potentially aggressive disease. The recent identification of several bladder cancer tumor markers has led to attempts to determine if these markers can enhance existing surveillance strategies by possibly tailoring surveillance strategies to individual patients. These markers may result in cost savings by properly identifying which patients can safely delay cystoscopy and which patients require more periodic assessment. Furthermore, we may be able to identify those patients with "occult disease" that require more invasive assessments and earlier aggressive treatment. We will review diagnostic considerations in the use of these markers for the detection of recurrent bladder cancer and summarize the benefits and costs of the more promising bladder cancer markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18092171     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-007-0232-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  35 in total

1.  Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers.

Authors:  Vinata B Lokeshwar; Tomonori Habuchi; H Barton Grossman; William M Murphy; Stefan H Hautmann; George P Hemstreet; Aldo V Bono; Robert H Getzenberg; Peter Goebell; Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger; Jack A Schalken; Yves Fradet; Michael Marberger; Edward Messing; Michael J Droller
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Watchful waiting policy in recurrent Ta G1 bladder tumors.

Authors:  Ofer N Gofrit; Dov Pode; Adi Lazar; Ran Katz; Amos Shapiro
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Molecular markers in bladder cancer: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 4.  Urine markers for bladder cancer surveillance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bas W G van Rhijn; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  uCyt+ test: alternative to cystoscopy for less-invasive follow-up of patients with low risk of urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Michele Lodde; Christine Mian; Evi Comploj; Salvatore Palermo; Elena Longhi; Michael Marberger; Armin Pycha
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Patient opinion of urinary tests versus flexible urethrocystoscopy in follow-up examination for superficial bladder cancer: a utility analysis.

Authors:  J L Vriesema; M H Poucki; L A Kiemeney; J A Witjes
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Early diagnosis and monitoring of superficial transitional cell carcinoma by microsatellite analysis on urine sediment.

Authors:  Riccardo Bartoletti; Maurizio Dal Canto; Tommaso Cai; Mauro Piazzini; Fabrizio Travaglini; Andrea Gavazzi; Michelangelo Rizzo
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Usefulness of urinary NMP22 to detect tumor recurrence of superficial bladder cancer after transurethral resection.

Authors:  Naoto Miyanaga; Hideyuki Akaza; Sadamu Tsukamoto; Toru Shimazui; Mikinobu Ohtani; Satoru Ishikawa; Ryosuke Noguchi; Fumio Manabe; Yukiko Nishijima; Koji Kikuchi; Ken Sato; Hitoshi Hayashi; Fukuji Kondo; Hiroshi Shiraiwa; Osamu Aoyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Superficial bladder cancer: progression and recurrence.

Authors:  N M Heney; S Ahmed; M J Flanagan; W Frable; M P Corder; M D Hafermann; I R Hawkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Medicare payments from diagnosis to death for elderly cancer patients by stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  G F Riley; A L Potosky; J D Lubitz; L G Kessler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of urinary XIAP as a diagnostic biomarker of carcinoma of urinary bladder.

Authors:  A K Srivastava; P K Singh; D Singh; D Dalela; S K Rath; M M Goel; M L B Bhatt
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-23

2.  Appraisal of diagnostic ability of UCA1 as a biomarker of carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  A K Srivastava; P K Singh; S K Rath; D Dalela; M M Goel; M L B Bhatt
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-08-15

3.  Implantable diagnostic device for cancer monitoring.

Authors:  Karen D Daniel; Grace Y Kim; Christophoros C Vassiliou; Marilyn Galindo; Alexander R Guimaraes; Ralph Weissleder; Al Charest; Robert Langer; Michael J Cima
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 4.  Multimodal management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jong Chul Park; Deborah E Citrin; Piyush K Agarwal; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 5.  The promise of novel molecular markers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jahan Miremami; Natasha Kyprianou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Illumination of a Vision-How Arthur Rimbaud Will Give Us Motivation to Find New Input into Bladder Cancer Biomarker Research.

Authors:  Thorsten H Ecke; Thomas Otto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.