Literature DB >> 12235351

AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Image processing in CT.

Dianna D Cody1.   

Abstract

Several image-processing methods for computed tomographic (CT) examinations are currently being used in clinical radiology departments. Image processing involves operations such as reformatting of original CT images, volume-rendered displays, surface-rendered displays, and physiologic imaging analysis. The reformatting process does not alter the CT voxels in any way; instead it uses them in off-axis views and displays the images produced from the original reconstruction process in an orientation other than how they were originally generated. Sagittal, coronal, oblique, and curved reformatting are standard reformatting methods. Other reformatting techniques include maximum-intensity projection, minimum-intensity projection, and variable thickness viewing. Volume and surface rendering are two different methods for reformatting axial images into three-dimensional views. CT perfusion allows the measurement of physiologic parameters over time. Additional postprocessing efforts can potentially add value to the patients and their outcomes, as can be seen in the cases that illustrate this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12235351     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.22.5.g02se041255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  31 in total

1.  Thoracolumbar junction: morphologic characteristics, various variants and significance.

Authors:  Se K Park; Jung G Park; Beom S Kim; Jin D Huh; Hee Kang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Multidetector CT of bowel obstruction: value of post-processing.

Authors:  S Aufort; L Charra; A Lesnik; J M Bruel; P Taourel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Relative value of sliding-thin-slab multiplanar reformations and sliding-thin-slab maximum intensity projections as reformatting techniques in multisection CT angiography of the cervicocranial vessels.

Authors:  B B Ertl-Wagner; R Bruening; J Blume; R-T Hoffmann; S Mueller-Schunk; B Snyder; M F Reiser
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  On-the-fly generation of multiplanar reformation images independent of CT scanner type.

Authors:  Dong Kyun Jeong; Kyoung Ho Lee; Bo Hyoung Kim; Kil Joong Kim; Young Hoon Kim; Vasundhara Bajpai; Yeong Gil Shin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Simplifying the exploration of volumetric images: development of a 3D user interface for the radiologist's workplace.

Authors:  M Teistler; R S Breiman; T Lison; O J Bott; D P Pretschner; A Aziz; W L Nowinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Technologies for image distribution in hospitals.

Authors:  Elmar Kotter; Tobias Baumann; Dieter Jäger; Mathias Langer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Comparative evaluation of multidetector CT and MR imaging in the differentiation of adnexal masses.

Authors:  A C Tsili; C Tsampoulas; M Argyropoulou; I Navrozoglou; Y Alamanos; E Paraskevaidis; S C Efremidis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Summation or axial slab average intensity projection of abdominal thin-section CT datasets: can they substitute for the primary reconstruction from raw projection data?

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Lee; Helen Hong; Seokyung Hahn; Bohyoung Kim; Kil Joong Kim; Young Hoon Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  The role of CT angiography in the evaluation of pediatric renovascular hypertension.

Authors:  Jessica Kurian; Monica Epelman; Kassa Darge; Kevin Meyers; Els Nijs; Jeffrey C Hellinger
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-12-04

10.  Effect of multi-planar CT image reformatting on surgeon diagnostic performance for localizing thoracolumbar disc extrusions in dogs.

Authors:  Jason B King; Jeryl C Jones; John H Rossmeisl; Tisha A Harper; Otto I Lanz; Stephen R Werre
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.