Bircan Erbas1, Quang Bui, Richard Huggins, Todd Harper, Victoria White. 1. Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Level 2, 723 Swanston Street, Carlton 3053, Victoria, Australia. b.erbas@unimelb.edu.au
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Quitline-an antismoking advertising and a telephone helpline service-is an effective public health intervention strategy for tobacco control. The objective of this short report is to model the relation between placement of antismoking advertisements and calls to Quitline on a given day. METHODS/ DESIGN: Data on daily Quitline antismoking advertisements, television target audience rating points (TARPS), and calls to Quitline Victoria were studied for the period 1 August 2000 and 31 July 2001. The outcome-calls to Quitline-is a count and thus assumed to follow a Poisson distribution. Generalised partial linear models were used to model the logarithm of mean daily calls as a non-parametric function of time and a linear parametric function of the day of week, number of advertisements, and TARPS. MAIN RESULTS: Peak calls to Quitline Victoria occurred during Monday to Wednesday with around three times as many calls compared with Sunday. Both placement of Quitline advertisements (p<0.001) and an increase in TARPS (p<0.001) on a given day significantly increased the number of calls made to Quitline Victoria. The model adequately captured fluctuations in call volume and diagnostics showed no model inadequacy. CONCLUSIONS: In this short report the emphasis is on modelling the parametric components-day of week, placement of advertisements, and TARPS on call volume. The dynamics of the underlying time trend in call volume is captured in a non-parametric component. Future analysis of hourly data would provide additional information to assess different media buying strategies that might increase call volume.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Quitline-an antismoking advertising and a telephone helpline service-is an effective public health intervention strategy for tobacco control. The objective of this short report is to model the relation between placement of antismoking advertisements and calls to Quitline on a given day. METHODS/ DESIGN: Data on daily Quitline antismoking advertisements, television target audience rating points (TARPS), and calls to Quitline Victoria were studied for the period 1 August 2000 and 31 July 2001. The outcome-calls to Quitline-is a count and thus assumed to follow a Poisson distribution. Generalised partial linear models were used to model the logarithm of mean daily calls as a non-parametric function of time and a linear parametric function of the day of week, number of advertisements, and TARPS. MAIN RESULTS: Peak calls to Quitline Victoria occurred during Monday to Wednesday with around three times as many calls compared with Sunday. Both placement of Quitline advertisements (p<0.001) and an increase in TARPS (p<0.001) on a given day significantly increased the number of calls made to Quitline Victoria. The model adequately captured fluctuations in call volume and diagnostics showed no model inadequacy. CONCLUSIONS: In this short report the emphasis is on modelling the parametric components-day of week, placement of advertisements, and TARPS on call volume. The dynamics of the underlying time trend in call volume is captured in a non-parametric component. Future analysis of hourly data would provide additional information to assess different media buying strategies that might increase call volume.
Authors: Shu-Hong Zhu; Christopher M Anderson; Gary J Tedeschi; Bradley Rosbrook; Cynthia E Johnson; Michael Byrd; Elsa Gutiérrez-Terrell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-10-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael C Fiore; Robert T Croyle; Susan J Curry; Charles M Cutler; Ronald M Davis; Catherine Gordon; Cheryl Healton; Howard K Koh; C Tracy Orleans; Dennis Richling; David Satcher; John Seffrin; Christine Williams; Larry N Williams; Paula A Keller; Timothy B Baker Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Taghrid Asfar; Robert C Klesges; Stacy D Sanford; Deborah Sherrill-Mittleman; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Grant Somes; James M Boyett; Harry Lando Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Behnoosh Momin; Antonio Neri; Kristen McCausland; Jennifer Duke; Heather Hansen; Jennifer Kahende; Lei Zhang; Sherri L Stewart Journal: J Community Health Date: 2014-08
Authors: Barbara A Schillo; Andrea Mowery; Lija O Greenseid; Michael G Luxenberg; Andrew Zieffler; Matthew Christenson; Raymond G Boyle Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 3.295