Literature DB >> 12878774

Uptake and effectiveness of the Australian telephone Quitline service in the context of a mass media campaign.

C L Miller1, M Wakefield, L Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Since June 1997, Australia has run its first nationally coordinated mass media anti-smoking campaign, with all States collaborating to offer a standard Quitline service. An overview of the Australian national Quitline service is presented as well as two studies describing (a) the relationship between television advertising and call volume and type, and (b) the quit rates of callers over time.
DESIGN: Data on extent of advertising, as measured by weekly television target audience rating points (TARPs), is compared with weekly call volume and disposition. A randomly selected sample of callers was followed up at 3 weeks, 6 months and 12 months to assess caller appraisal and quit rates.
SETTING: The Australian Quitline service, in the context of a nationally coordinated, major anti tobacco campaign.
RESULTS: In a one year period from June 1997, 3.6% of adult Australian smokers called the Quitline. Weekly call volume was strongly related to TARPs and increased further when an advertisement specifically promoting the Quitline was broadcast. Calls involving requests for counselling, as opposed to brief calls to request quit materials, were more likely with lower TARPs. Of the cohort who were smoking at baseline, 28% reported they had quit smoking at a one year follow up and 5% had been quit for an entire year.
CONCLUSIONS: In the context of a national mass media campaign, this study illustrates that it is possible to bring together differing State based services to provide an accessible, acceptable, and effective quit smoking service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12878774      PMCID: PMC1766110          DOI: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_2.ii53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  57 in total

1.  Promoting tobacco cessation and smoke-free workplaces through community outreach partnerships in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Elba C Díaz-Toro; Maria E Fernández; Virmarie Correa-Fernández; William A Calo; Ana Patricia Ortiz; Luz M Mejía; Carlos A Mazas; Maria del Carmen Santos-Ortiz; David W Wetter
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2014

2.  Investigating the relation between placement of Quit antismoking advertisements and number of telephone calls to Quitline: a semiparametric modelling approach.

Authors:  Bircan Erbas; Quang Bui; Richard Huggins; Todd Harper; Victoria White
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Seasonal variations in stage of change among Quitline clients.

Authors:  C N Delnevo; J Foulds; U Vorbach; E Kazimir
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Antismoking television advertising and socioeconomic variations in calls to Quitline.

Authors:  Mohammad Siahpush; Melanie Wakefield; Matt Spittal; Sarah Durkin
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of telephone counselling and the nicotine patch in a state tobacco quitline.

Authors:  Jack F Hollis; Timothy A McAfee; Jeffrey L Fellows; Susan M Zbikowski; Michael Stark; Karen Riedlinger
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of television, radio and print advertisements in promoting the New York smokers' quitline.

Authors:  Matthew C Farrelly; Altijani Hussin; Ursula E Bauer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Expanding access to nicotine replacement therapy through Minnesota's QUITLINE partnership.

Authors:  Barbara A Schillo; Ann Wendling; Jessie Saul; Michael G Luxenberg; Randi Lachter; Matthew Christenson; Lawrence C An
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Televised antismoking advertising: effects of level and duration of exposure.

Authors:  Sally Dunlop; Trish Cotter; Donna Perez; Melanie Wakefield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Cognitive barriers to calling a smoking quitline.

Authors:  Laura J Solomon; John R Hughes; Amy Livingston; Shelly Naud; Peter W Callas; Erica N Peters; Jody Kamon; Jean-Francois Etter
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  An observational study of the Korean proactive quitline service for smoking cessation and relapse prevention.

Authors:  Seung-Kwon Myung; Hong Gwan Seo; Eun Cheol Park; Min Kyung Lim; Yeol Kim
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.