Literature DB >> 16411996

A prospective randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi Omnicup versus conventional ventouse cups for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.

K M Groom1, B A Jones, N Miller, S Paterson-Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance and safety of the Kiwi Omnicup and compare it to conventional vacuum cups in routine clinical practice.
DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi Omnicup versus conventional vacuum cups.
SETTING: Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital in London from April 2001 to March 2004. POPULATION: Women requiring assisted vaginal delivery by ventouse.
METHODS: Women were randomised to the Kiwi Omnicup (n=206) or conventional vacuum cups (n=198). Data regarding maternal demographics, labour, mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal outcome were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure of delivery with instrument of first choice.
RESULTS: The Kiwi Omnicup was less successful at delivery with instrument of first choice than the conventional ventouse, failure rate 30.1 versus 19.2% (RR 1.58; 95% CI 1.10-2.24). It was associated with a greater number of cup detachments (mean 0.68 compared with 0.28, with 44% compared with 18% having at least one detachment [P<0.0001]). There was no difference in the incidence of severe maternal trauma, and there were no cases of serious neonatal injury.
CONCLUSIONS: The Kiwi Omnicup is less successful than conventional ventouse in achieving vaginal delivery, but its safety profile is comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16411996     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00834.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  11 in total

1.  Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Unzila A Ali; Errol R Norwitz
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

2.  Comparison of Obstetric Efficacy and Safety of the Kiwi OmniCup with Conventional Vacuum Extraction.

Authors:  W Siggelkow; N Schwarz; M W Beckmann; S Kehl; F Faschingbauer; R L Schild
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  Instruments for assisted vaginal birth.

Authors:  Ganga L Verma; Jessica J Spalding; Marc D Wilkinson; G Justus Hofmeyr; Valerie Vannevel; Fidelma O'Mahony
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-24

4.  Audit of a program to increase the use of vacuum extraction in Mulago Hospital, Uganda.

Authors:  Barbara Nolens; John Lule; Flavia Namiiro; Jos van Roosmalen; Josaphat Byamugisha
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Decreased neonatal pain response after vaginal-operative delivery with Kiwi OmniCup versus metal ventouse.

Authors:  E A Huhn; E Visca; D R Vogt; S von Felten; E M Tinner Oehler; C Bührer; D Surbek; R Zimmermann; I Hoesli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  A randomized comparison of video demonstration versus hands-on training of medical students for vacuum delivery using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS).

Authors:  Ziad Hilal; Anne K Kumpernatz; Günther A Rezniczek; Cem Cetin; Eva-Katrin Tempfer-Bentz; Clemens B Tempfer
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Prospective assessment of vacuum deliveries from midpelvic station in a tertiary care university hospital: Frequency, failure rates, labor characteristics and maternal and neonatal complications.

Authors:  Meryam Sugulle; Erna Halldórsdóttir; Janne Kvile; Line Sissel Dahlgaard Berntzen; Anne Flem Jacobsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Exploring the reporting standards of RCTs involving invasive procedures for assisted vaginal birth: A systematic review.

Authors:  Emily J Hotton; Sophie Renwick; Erik Lenguerrand; Julia Wade; Tim J Draycott; Joanna F Crofts; Natalie S Blencowe
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Clinical impact of the disposable ventouse iCup® versus a metallic vacuum cup: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Véronique Equy; Sandra David-Tchouda; Michel Dreyfus; Didier Riethmuller; Françoise Vendittelli; Victoire Cabaud; Bruno Langer; Jennifer Margier; Jean-Luc Bosson; Jean-Patrick Schaal
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Comparison of a practice-based versus theory-based training program for conducting vacuum-assisted deliveries: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Julian Marschalek; Lorenz Kuessel; Maria Stammler-Safar; Herbert Kiss; Johannes Ott; Heinrich Husslein
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.