Literature DB >> 16411498

Predicting neuronal responses during natural vision.

Stephen V David1, Jack L Gallant.   

Abstract

A model that fully describes the response properties of visual neurons must be able to predict their activity during natural vision. While many models have been proposed for the visual system, few have ever been tested against this criterion. To address this issue, we have developed a general framework for fitting and validating nonlinear models of visual neurons using natural visual stimuli. Our approach derives from linear spatiotemporal receptive field (STRF) analysis, which has frequently been used to study the visual system. However, prior to the linear filtering stage typical of STRFs, a linearizing transformation is applied to the stimulus to account for nonlinear response properties. We used this approach to compare two models for neurons in primary visual cortex: a nonlinear Fourier power model, which accounts for spatial phase invariant tuning, and a traditional linear model. We characterized prediction accuracy in terms of the total explainable variance, given intrinsic experimental noise. On average, Fourier power STRFs predicted 40% of explainable variance while linear STRFs were able to predict only 21% of explainable variance. The performance of the Fourier power model provides a benchmark for evaluating more sophisticated models in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16411498     DOI: 10.1080/09548980500464030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Network        ISSN: 0954-898X            Impact factor:   1.273


  63 in total

1.  Hierarchical processing of complex motion along the primate dorsal visual pathway.

Authors:  Patrick J Mineault; Farhan A Khawaja; Daniel A Butts; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Local image statistics: maximum-entropy constructions and perceptual salience.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Mary M Conte
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  The berkeley wavelet transform: a biologically inspired orthogonal wavelet transform.

Authors:  Ben Willmore; Ryan J Prenger; Michael C-K Wu; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Preserving information in neural transmission.

Authors:  Lawrence C Sincich; Jonathan C Horton; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Integration over multiple timescales in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Dynamic spectrotemporal feature selectivity in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Nicholas A Lesica; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The spatiotemporal frequency tuning of LGN receptive field facilitates neural discrimination of natural stimuli.

Authors:  Zhongchao Tan; Haishan Yao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Rafael Malach; David J Heeger
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Rapid synaptic depression explains nonlinear modulation of spectro-temporal tuning in primary auditory cortex by natural stimuli.

Authors:  Stephen V David; Nima Mesgarani; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Bayesian reconstruction of natural images from human brain activity.

Authors:  Thomas Naselaris; Ryan J Prenger; Kendrick N Kay; Michael Oliver; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.