Literature DB >> 1641116

To halve and to halve not: an analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects.

A D Milner1, M Brechmann, L Pagliarini.   

Abstract

Normal adults were tested in a series of three experiments to examine the influences of spatial location and cueing upon line bisection judgements. Judgements in all three experiments were strongly influenced by cueing with a letter at one or other end of the line. The spatial location of the line (in left, central or right body space) also had a minor effect in Experiments 1 and 2, where evidence was additionally found for a small constant error when lines were presented centrally. It is argued from the results of Experiments 2 and 3, where no explicit bisection response was required, that perceptual/attentional factors, rather than an orienting bias, play the major role in mediating the cueing effect. It is concluded that there is a substantial attentional effect upon judgements of extent, whereby paying less attention decreases perceived relative line length. However the constant error and the effect of spatial location, whilst mainly perceptual in nature, may also be partly determined by premotor orienting biases caused by differential hemispheric activation.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1641116     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90055-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  60 in total

1.  Visual search pattern during the line quadrisection task in normal subjects.

Authors:  Byung H Lee; Yong Jeong; Sue J Kang; Min J Baek; Juhee Chin; John C Adair; Duk L Na
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Examining the influence of 'noise' on judgements of spatial extent.

Authors:  Derick F Valadao; Marc Hurwitz; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spatial distortions in localization and midline estimation in hemianopia and normal vision.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Thomas M VanVleet; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Christopher A Pierce; Anjan Chatterjee; Britt Anderson; George Jewell; Rachael Dowler; Adam J Woods; Tannahill Glenn; Victor W Mark
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Anika Maraj; Ashlee Gradkowski; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in near and far space.

Authors:  John P Garza; Paul J Eslinger; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Static versus dynamic judgments of spatial extent.

Authors:  Marc Hurwitz; Derick Valadao; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina Hughes; Jason B Mattingley; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The bisection point across variants of the task.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Eli Peli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Decreased leftward 'aiming' motor-intentional spatial cuing in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Daymond Wagner; Paul J Eslinger; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.