Literature DB >> 16410072

Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use.

Ya Shen1, Gary Shun-pan Cheung, Zhuan Bian, Bin Peng.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence and mode of instrument separation of the two nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary systems that were used according to a predefined schedule of clinical use by the same group of operators. A total of 166 ProFile and 325 ProTaper instruments, discarded from this endodontic clinic over 17 months, was analyzed. The incidences of instrument separation were 7% for ProFile and 14% for ProTaper (p < 0.05). The proportion of unwinding defects was 5% in ProFile and 0.3% in ProTaper instruments (p < 0.01). Flexural fatigue was implicated in the majority of separations in both groups. The results of this study indicated that while ProTaper was more likely to separate without warning, ProFile tended to exhibit unwinding of flutes more frequently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16410072     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  25 in total

1.  A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals.

Authors:  Young-Sil Yoo; Yong-Bum Cho
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2012-11-21

2.  Endodontic retreatment: clinical comparison of reciprocating systems versus rotary system in disinfecting root canals.

Authors:  Frederico C Martinho; Lilian F Freitas; Gustavo G Nascimento; Aleteia M Fernandes; Fabio R M Leite; Ana P M Gomes; Izabel C G Camões
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Cyclic fatigue resistance of R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider, and ProGlider glide path instruments.

Authors:  Cangül Keskin; Uğur İnan; Murat Demiral; Ali Keleş
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Cyclic fatigue resistance of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a comparative study.

Authors:  Eugenio Pedullà; Gianluca Plotino; Nicola Maria Grande; Alfio Pappalardo; Ernesto Rapisarda
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-08-09

5.  Evaluation of deformation and fracture rates for nickel-titanium rotary instruments according to the frequency of clinical use.

Authors:  Ayça Yılmaz; Sıtkı Selçuk Gökyay; Rüştü Dağlaroğlu; Işıl Karagöz Küçükay
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2018-05-01

6.  Comparison of the centering ability of Wave·One and Reciproc nickel-titanium instruments in simulated curved canals.

Authors:  Young-Jun Lim; Su-Jung Park; Hyeon-Cheol Kim; Kyung-San Min
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2013-02-26

7.  A comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance for different endodontic NiTi rotary files: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Akanksha Bhatt; Balakrishnan Rajkumar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-01-02

8.  An in vitro cyclic fatigue resistance comparison of conventional and new generation nickel-titanium rotary files.

Authors:  Celia Ruiz-Sánchez; Vicente Faus-Matoses; Teresa Alegre-Domingo; Ignacio Faus-Matoses; Vicente-José Faus-Llácer
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-08-01

9.  Cyclic Fatigue Resistance and Fractographic Analysis of Race and Protaper Rotary NiTi Instruments.

Authors:  Shahram Azimi; Parisa Delvari; Hamid Cyrus Hajarian; Mohammad Ali Saghiri; Kasra Karamifar; Mehrdad Lotfi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2011-05-15

10.  A survey of experience-based preference of Nickel-Titanium rotary files and incidence of fracture among general dentists.

Authors:  Woocheol Lee; Minju Song; Euiseong Kim; Hyojin Lee; Hyeon-Cheol Kim
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2012-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.