Literature DB >> 16406892

Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins.

Michael A Simon1, Sandy Kim, Mark S Soloway.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treatment in patients with a positive surgical margin after radical retropubic prostatectomy is controversial. Options are observation, radiation therapy and early hormone therapy. Making the appropriate choice should be based on an understanding of the risk of recurrence without treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 1,383 patients after radical retropubic prostatectomy was performed by a single surgeon. All specimens were analyzed by a single pathologist. Of the patients 936 met criteria for analysis.
RESULTS: Mean followup in these 936 patients was 45.8 months (minimum 12). The overall PSA biochemical recurrence rate was 11.5% (108 of 936 cases). Of the 936 patients 350 (37%) had tumor at an inked margin. These patients had a recurrence rate of 19% (67 of 350), while patients with negative margins had a recurrence rate of 7% (41 of 586). This difference was statistically significant (p <0.01). Multivariate HR analysis revealed that significant risk factors for recurrence in the 936 patients were PSA greater than 20 ng/ml, clinical stage T2 or greater, Gleason 7 or greater, seminal vesicle involvement, extraprostatic extension, a visual estimate of prostate cancer volume of greater than 9.1% and positive surgical margins. Statistically significant risk factors for recurrence in patients with a positive margin on multivariate HR analysis were PSA greater than 20 ng/ml, Gleason score 7 or greater and seminal vesicle involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the positive margin rate in this series was 37%, the recurrence rate in these patients was only 19%. It is important to consider other factors, such as PSA, Gleason score, seminal vesicle involvement and extraprostatic extension, when making treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16406892     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00050-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

1.  Prognostic factors identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ioannis Anastasiou; Stavros I Tyritzis; Ioannis Adamakis; Dionysios Mitropoulos; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Antonios Balangas; Anastasios Kollias; Kitty Pavlakis; Constantinos A Constantinides
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Intraoperative Frozen Section of the Prostate Reduces the Risk of Positive Margin Whilst Ensuring Nerve Sparing in Patients with Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: First Reported UK Series.

Authors:  Nikhil Vasdev; Samita Agarwal; Bhavan P Rai; Arany Soosainathan; Gregory Shaw; Sebastian Chang; Venkat Prasad; Gowrie Mohan-S; James M Adshead
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2016-05-20

3.  [Seminal vesicle sparing radical perineal prostatectomy].

Authors:  S Schäfers; P de Geeter; H Löhmer; P Albers
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?

Authors:  Caroline Pettenati; Yann Neuzillet; Camelia Radulescu; Jean-Marie Hervé; Vincent Molinié; Thierry Lebret
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Detection of Local Recurrence with 3-Tesla MRI After Radical Prostatectomy: A Useful Method for Radiation Treatment Planning?

Authors:  Daniel Buergy; Metin Sertdemir; Anja Weidner; Mohamed Shelan; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz; Stefan O Schoenberg; Ulrike I Attenberger
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality.

Authors:  Jonathan L Wright; Bruce L Dalkin; Lawrence D True; William J Ellis; Janet L Stanford; Paul H Lange; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Cancer Care Ontario Guidelines for radical prostatectomy: striving for continuous quality improvement in community practice.

Authors:  Todd M Webster; Christopher Newell; John F Amrhein; Ken J Newell
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Impact of nerve sparing on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  J L Nelles; S J Freedland; J C Presti; M K Terris; W J Aronson; C L Amling; C J Kane
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Joseph W Basler
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Frequency of positive surgical margin at prostatectomy and its effect on patient outcome.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; M Scott Lucia
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.