Literature DB >> 25939539

Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?

Caroline Pettenati1, Yann Neuzillet2, Camelia Radulescu2, Jean-Marie Hervé2, Vincent Molinié3, Thierry Lebret2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Positive surgical margins (PSMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP) are a known factor associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and raise the issue of adjuvant treatment by radiotherapy versus salvage treatment at recurrence. To help this choice, our study aimed to analyze BCR-free survival and factors associated with BCR in patients with PSM and undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA).
METHODS: Between 2005 and 2008, 630 patients had RP for localized prostate cancer in our center. We included patients with PSM, uninvaded nods, undetectable postoperative PSA and no adjuvant treatment. The 5-year BCR-free survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic regression models were used to determine the factors associated with BCR in univariate and multivariate analyses (Cox model).
RESULTS: The PSM rate was 32.7 % (n = 206 patients), and 110 patients corresponded to the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 72 months. The BCR rate was 30 % with a 5-year BCR-free survival of 83.9 %. The factors significantly associated with BCR were preoperative PSA, predominance and percentage of Gleason 4, tumor volume, PSM length and predominance of Gleason 4 at the margin. In the multivariate analysis, the remaining two significant factors were PSM length [OR 4.35, 95 % CI (1.011-1.421), p = 0.037] and tumor volume [OR 4.29, 95 % CI (1.011-1.483), p = 0.038].
CONCLUSION: Over a 5-year follow-up, only one-third of patients experienced BCR. It might be reasonable to postpone adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with PSM and undetectable PSA after RP. Tumor volume and PSM length were associated with BCR and should be taken into account in the postoperative treatment management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant radiotherapy; Biochemical recurrence; Margin; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25939539     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1580-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  30 in total

Review 1.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling.

Authors:  Hemamali Samaratunga; Rodolfo Montironi; Lawrence True; Jonathan I Epstein; David F Griffiths; Peter A Humphrey; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas M Wheeler; John R Srigley; Brett Delahunt; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Adjuvant radiotherapy versus wait-and-see after radical prostatectomy: 10-year follow-up of the ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95 trial.

Authors:  Thomas Wiegel; Detlef Bartkowiak; Dirk Bottke; Claudia Bronner; Ursula Steiner; Alessandra Siegmann; Reinhard Golz; Stephan Störkel; Normann Willich; Axel Semjonow; Michael Stöckle; Christian Rübe; Udo Rebmann; Tilman Kälble; Horst Jürgen Feldmann; Manfred Wirth; Rainer Hofmann; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Axel Hinke; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Kurt Miller
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Ability of linear length of positive margin in radical prostatectomy specimens to predict biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Dengfeng Cao; Peter A Humphrey; Feng Gao; Yu Tao; Adam S Kibel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a.

Authors:  Katia R M Leite; Carolina Hartmann; Sabrina T Reis; Nayara Viana; Marcos F Dall'Oglio; Alexandre C Sant'Anna; Adriano Nesrallah; Luciano Nesrallah; Alberto A Antunes; Luiz H Camara-Lopes; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 5.  Clinical significance of the positive surgical margin based upon location, grade, and stage.

Authors:  Neil E Fleshner; Andrew Evans; Karen Chadwick; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Alexandre Zlotta
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Gerald W Hull; Farhang Rabbani; Farhat Abbas; Thomas M Wheeler; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Richard Savdie; Lisa G Horvath; Ruth Pe Benito; Krishan K Rasiah; Anne-Maree Haynes; Mark Chatfield; Phillip D Stricker; Jennifer J Turner; Warwick Delprado; Susan M Henshall; Robert L Sutherland; James G Kench
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sergey Shikanov; Pablo Marchetti; Vikas Desai; Aria Razmaria; Tatjana Antic; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Gregory Zagaja; Scott Eggener; Charles Brendler; Arieh Shalhav
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  [Prostate cancer surgical margin: review by the CCAFU (Oncology Committee of the French Association of Urology)].

Authors:  L Cormier; C Bastide; P Beuzeboc; G Fromont; C Hennequin; P Mongiat-Artus; M Peyromaure; G Ploussard; R Renard-Penna; P Richaud; F Rozet; M Soulié; L Salomon
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 0.915

Review 10.  [Postoperative radiotherapy of prostate cancer].

Authors:  S Guérif; I Latorzeff; J-L Lagrange; C Hennequin; S Supiot; A Garcia; P François; M Soulié; P Richaud; L Salomon
Journal:  Cancer Radiother       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 1.018

View more
  9 in total

1.  Preoperative characteristics of the P.R.O.S.T.A.T.E. scores: a novel predictive tool for the risk of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ben Xu; Cheng Luo; Qian Zhang; Jie Jin
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy in prostate cancer: multi-institutional retrospective analysis of the Spanish RECAP database.

Authors:  A Hervás; A Gómez-Caamaño; M Casaña; A Gómez-Iturriaga; J Pastor; J Jove; J L Mengual; C Gónzalez-San Segundo; J Muñoz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Extended versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection during bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy and its effect on continence and erectile function recovery: long-term results and trifecta rates of a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gudrun Wagenpfeil; Tobias Maurer; Thomas Horn; Kathleen Herkommer; Marie Hegemann; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hubert Kübler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Tumor volume improves the long-term prediction of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer with positive surgical margins.

Authors:  Christian P Meyer; Jens Hansen; Katharina Boehm; Derya Tilki; Firas Abdollah; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Margit Fisch; Guido Sauter; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Felix K H Chun; Sascha A Ahyai
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy: 10 years of cases at Ramathibodi Hospital.

Authors:  Kun Sirisopana; Pocharapong Jenjitranant; Premsant Sangkum; Kittinut Kijvikai; Suthep Pacharatakul; Charoen Leenanupun; Wachira Kochakarn; Wisoot Kongchareonsombat
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-10

Review 6.  Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Lijin Zhang; Bin Wu; Zhenlei Zha; Hu Zhao; Yuefang Jiang; Jun Yuan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Factors affecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy in patients with positive and negative surgical margin.

Authors:  Serdar Celik; Anıl Eker; İbrahim Halil Bozkurt; Deniz Bolat; İsmail Basmacı; Ertuğrul Şefik; Tansu Değirmenci; Bülent Günlüsoy
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2020-09-17

8.  Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy Effects on Perioperative Outcomes Prior to Radical Prostatectomy: Eleven Years of Experiences at Ramathibodi Hospital.

Authors:  Premsant Sangkum; Kun Sirisopana; Pocharapong Jenjitranant; Kittinut Kijvikai; Suthep Pacharatakul; Charoen Leenanupunth; Wachira Kochakarn; Wisoot Kongchareonsombat
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-06-01

9.  Impact of Gleason score of the tumor at the positive surgical margin as a prognostic factor.

Authors:  Hirofumi Kurose; Kosuke Ueda; Naoyuki Ogasawara; Katsuaki Chikui; Makoto Nakiri; Kiyoaki Nishihara; Mitsunori Matsuo; Shigetaka Suekane; Hironori Kusano; Jun Akiba; Hirohisa Yano; Tsukasa Igawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.