Literature DB >> 16403158

Does a gender difference in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy exist?

Gabe B Bleeker1, Martin J Schalij, Eric Boersma, Paul Steendijk, Ernst E van der Wall, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has a beneficial effect on clinical symptoms, exercise capacity, and systolic left ventricular (LV) performance in patients with heart failure. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether a gender difference exists in response to CRT.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with end-stage heart failure (New York Heart Association, NYHA, class III-IV), LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =35%, QRS duration >120 ms, and left bundle branch block configuration underwent CRT. At baseline and 6 months post-CRT, clinical and echocardiographic parameters were evaluated; follow-up was obtained up to 5 years. The effects of CRT were compared between women and men.
RESULTS: The study population comprised 137 men and 36 women (mean age 66 +/- 11 years). No differences in baseline characteristics were observed except that nonischemic cardiomyopathy was more frequent in women than men (67% vs 38%, P < 0.05). In all patients, clinical and echocardiographic parameters improved significantly at 6-month follow-up. The magnitude of improvement in different parameters was similar between women and men, e.g., the improvement in NYHA Class was 0.9 +/- 0.6 in women and 1.0 +/- 0.7 in men (NS) and the increase in LVEF was 8 +/- 8% in women as compared to 7 +/- 9% in men (NS). The percentage of individual responders was not different between women and men (76% vs 80%, NS) and 2-year survival was comparable for women and men (84% vs 80%, NS).
CONCLUSION: No gender differences were observed in response to CRT and long-term survival after CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16403158     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00267.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical, laboratory, and pacing predictors of CRT response.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Robert K Altman; Mi Young Park; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Controversies in cardiac resynchronization therapy: do sex differences in response exist?

Authors:  Robin E Germany; Toni L Ripley
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2011-03

Review 3.  Sex differences in device therapy for heart failure: utilization, outcomes, and adverse events.

Authors:  Naomi D Herz; Joseph Engeda; Robbert Zusterzeel; William E Sanders; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; David G Strauss; Samantha B Jacobs; Kimberly A Selzman; Ileana L Piña; Daniel A Caños
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Sex-Based Differences in Cardiac Arrhythmias, ICD Utilisation and Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy.

Authors:  A Ghani; A H E M Maas; P P H M Delnoy; A R Ramdat Misier; J P Ottervanger; A Elvan
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Characteristics of responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: the impact of echocardiographic left ventricular volume.

Authors:  Mi Young Park; Robert K Altman; Mary Orencole; Prabhat Kumar; Kimberly A Parks; Kevin E Heist; Jagmeet P Singh; Michael H Picard
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Outcomes in Women Undergoing Electrophysiological Procedures.

Authors:  Pasquale Santangeli; Luigi Di Biase; Eloisa Basile; Amin Al-Ahmad; Andrea Natale
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2013-04

Review 7.  The impact of gender difference on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with heart failure after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fa-Hui Yin; Chun-Lei Fan; Ya-Ya Guo; Hai Zhu; Zhi-Lu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.