Literature DB >> 26835039

Outcomes in Women Undergoing Electrophysiological Procedures.

Pasquale Santangeli1, Luigi Di Biase2, Eloisa Basile3, Amin Al-Ahmad4, Andrea Natale5.   

Abstract

The number of invasive electrophysiological procedures is steadily increasing in Western countries, as the age of the population increases and technologies advance. In recent years, gender-related differences in cardiac rhythm disorders have been increasingly appreciated, which can potentially have a great impact on the outcomes of invasive electrophysiological procedures. Among supraventricular arrhythmias, women have a higher incidence of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and a significantly lower incidence of atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia compared with males, and present to ablation procedures later and after having failed more antiarrhythmic drugs. The results of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in women have been reported worse than in men. This finding is possibly due to a later referral of females to ablation procedures, who present older and with a higher incidence of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. With regard to cardiac device implantation procedures, a smaller survival benefit from prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation has been shown in women, essentially due to gender-specific differences in the clinical course of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, with women dying predominantly from non-arrhythmic causes. On the other side, the clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronisation therapy seems to be more favourable in women, who experience a greater degree of reverse left ventricular remodelling and a striking decrease of heart failure events or mortality after biventricular pacing. This review will summarise the available evidence on gender-related differences in outcomes of invasive electrophysiological procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender differences; cardiac resynchronisation therapy; defibrillators; implantable device; radiofrequency catheter ablation

Year:  2013        PMID: 26835039      PMCID: PMC4711560          DOI: 10.15420/aer.2013.2.1.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev        ISSN: 2050-3369


  65 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure: biventricular pacing and beyond.

Authors:  William T Abraham
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Sex differences in selection of pacemakers: retrospective observational study.

Authors:  R Schüppel; G Büchele; L Batz; W Koenig
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-16

3.  Influence of gender on inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias in survivors of cardiac arrest with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  P T Vaitkus; K E Kindwall; J M Miller; F E Marchlinski; A E Buxton; M E Josephson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Diurnal heart rate variability in healthy subjects: effects of aging and sex difference.

Authors:  Y Yamasaki; M Kodama; M Matsuhisa; M Kishimoto; H Ozaki; A Tani; N Ueda; Y Ishida; T Kamada
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1996-07

5.  The frequency and incremental cost of major complications among medicare beneficiaries receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Matthew R Reynolds; David J Cohen; Aaron D Kugelmass; Phillip P Brown; Edmund R Becker; Steven D Culler; April W Simon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Long-term survival after permanent pacemaker implantation: analysis of predictors for increased mortality.

Authors:  J R Pyatt; J D Somauroo; M Jackson; A D Grayson; S Osula; R K Aggarwal; R G Charles; D T Connelly
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Risk for systemic embolization of atrial fibrillation without mitral stenosis.

Authors:  H S Cabin; K S Clubb; C Hall; R A Perlmutter; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  The influence of gender on arrhythmias.

Authors:  Robert W Peters; Michael R Gold
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  Gender differences in procedure-related adverse events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.

Authors:  Pamela N Peterson; Stacie L Daugherty; Yongfei Wang; Humberto J Vidaillet; Paul A Heidenreich; Jeptha P Curtis; Frederick A Masoudi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillators: do women fare worse than men? Gender comparison in the INTRINSIC RV trial.

Authors:  Andrea M Russo; John D Day; Kira Stolen; Christopher M Mullin; Vinayak Doraiswamy; Darin L Lerew; Brian Olshansky
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.