BACKGROUND: One-third of patients who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are classified as nonresponders. Characteristics of responders to CRT have been studied in multiple clinical trials. HYPOTHESIS: Independent predictors of CRT response may be identified by studying a series of patients in routine clinical practice. METHOD: One hundred twenty-five patients were examined retrospectively from a multidisciplinary CRT clinic program. Echocardiographic CRT response was defined as a decrease in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume of ≥15% and/or absolute increase of 5% in LV ejection fraction at the 6-month visit. RESULTS: There were 81 responders and 44 nonresponders. By univariate analyses, female sex, nonischemic cardiomyopathy etiology, baseline QRS duration, the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) index predicted CRT response. However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that only QRS duration, LBBB, and LVEDV index were independent predictors (QRS width, odds ratio [OR]: 1.027, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.004-1.050, P = 0.023; LBBB, OR: 3.568, 95% CI: 1.284-9.910, P = 0.015; LVEDV index, OR: 0.970, 95% CI: 0.953-0.987, P = 0.001). Although female sex and nonischemic etiology were associated with an improved CRT response on univariate analyses, after adjusting for LV volumes they were not independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: QRS width, LBBB, and LVEDV index are independent predictors for echocardiographic CRT response. Previously reported differences in CRT response for sex and cardiomyopathy etiology are associated with differences in baseline LV volumes in our clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: One-third of patients who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are classified as nonresponders. Characteristics of responders to CRT have been studied in multiple clinical trials. HYPOTHESIS: Independent predictors of CRT response may be identified by studying a series of patients in routine clinical practice. METHOD: One hundred twenty-five patients were examined retrospectively from a multidisciplinary CRT clinic program. Echocardiographic CRT response was defined as a decrease in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume of ≥15% and/or absolute increase of 5% in LV ejection fraction at the 6-month visit. RESULTS: There were 81 responders and 44 nonresponders. By univariate analyses, female sex, nonischemic cardiomyopathy etiology, baseline QRS duration, the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) index predicted CRT response. However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that only QRS duration, LBBB, and LVEDV index were independent predictors (QRS width, odds ratio [OR]: 1.027, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.004-1.050, P = 0.023; LBBB, OR: 3.568, 95% CI: 1.284-9.910, P = 0.015; LVEDV index, OR: 0.970, 95% CI: 0.953-0.987, P = 0.001). Although female sex and nonischemic etiology were associated with an improved CRT response on univariate analyses, after adjusting for LV volumes they were not independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: QRS width, LBBB, and LVEDV index are independent predictors for echocardiographic CRT response. Previously reported differences in CRT response for sex and cardiomyopathy etiology are associated with differences in baseline LV volumes in our clinical practice.
Authors: Christopher J McLeod; Win-Kuang Shen; Robert F Rea; Paul A Friedman; David L Hayes; Anita Wokhlu; Tracy L Webster; Heather J Wiste; David O Hodge; David J Bradley; Stephen C Hammill; Douglas L Packer; Yong-Mei Cha Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Nina Ajmone Marsan; Gabe B Bleeker; Rutger J van Bommel; Claudia Ypenburg; Victoria Delgado; C Jan Willem Borleffs; Eduard R Holman; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2008-12-26 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Robert K Altman; Kimberly A Parks; Christopher L Schlett; Mary Orencole; Mi-Young Park; Quynh A Truong; Peerawut Deeprasertkul; Stephanie A Moore; Conor D Barrett; Gregory D Lewis; Saumya Das; Gaurav A Upadhyay; E Kevin Heist; Michael H Picard; Jagmeet P Singh Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Andrew E Epstein; John P DiMarco; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Roger A Freedman; Leonard S Gettes; A Marc Gillinov; Gabriel Gregoratos; Stephen C Hammill; David L Hayes; Mark A Hlatky; L Kristin Newby; Richard L Page; Mark H Schoenfeld; Michael J Silka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Michael O Sweeney; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Christopher E Buller; Mark A Creager; Steven M Ettinger; David P Faxon; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon A Hunt; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Bruce W Lytle; Rick A Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel; Lynn G Tarkington; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Aysha Arshad; Arthur J Moss; Elyse Foster; Luigi Padeletti; Alon Barsheshet; Ilan Goldenberg; Henry Greenberg; W Jackson Hall; Scott McNitt; Wojciech Zareba; Scott Solomon; Jonathan S Steinberg Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gabe B Bleeker; Martin J Schalij; Eric Boersma; Paul Steendijk; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Eugene S Chung; Angel R Leon; Luigi Tavazzi; Jing-Ping Sun; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John Merlino; William T Abraham; Stefano Ghio; Christophe Leclercq; Jeroen J Bax; Cheuk-Man Yu; John Gorcsan; Martin St John Sutton; Johan De Sutter; Jaime Murillo Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rutger J van Bommel; Jeroen J Bax; William T Abraham; Eugene S Chung; Luis A Pires; Luigi Tavazzi; Peter J Zimetbaum; Bart Gerritse; Nina Kristiansen; Stefano Ghio Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-08-30 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Victoria Delgado; Claudia Ypenburg; Rutger J van Bommel; Laurens F Tops; Sjoerd A Mollema; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Gabe B Bleeker; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Matthew Richardson; Nick Freemantle; Melanie J Calvert; John G F Cleland; Luigi Tavazzi Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-05-31 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Kiran Sidhu; Anna Isotta Castrini; Victoria Parikh; Nosheen Reza; Anjali Owens; Maxime Tremblay-Gravel; Matthew T Wheeler; Luisa Mestroni; Matthew Taylor; Sharon Graw; Marta Gigli; Marco Merlo; Alessia Paldino; Gianfranco Sinagra; Daniel P Judge; Hannia Ramos; Olurotimi Mesubi; Emily Brown; Samual Turnbull; Saurabh Kumar; Darius Roy; Usha B Tedrow; Long Ngo; Kristina Haugaa; Neal K Lakdawala Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 17.349
Authors: Quynh A Truong; Jackie Szymonifka; James L Januzzi; Jigar H Contractor; Roderick C Deaño; Neal A Chatterjee; Jagmeet P Singh Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2018-12-24 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Bruce D Nearing; Imad Libbus; Gerrard M Carlson; Badri Amurthur; Bruce H KenKnight; Richard L Verrier Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 4.435
Authors: Benjamin J Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Baldeep S Sidhu; Jonathan M Behar; Simon Claridge; Steve Niederer; Christopher A Rinaldi Journal: Expert Rev Med Devices Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 3.166
Authors: Yanrong Yin; Konstantinos Dimopoulos; Eriko Shimada; Karen Lascelles; Samuel Griffiths; Tom Wong; Michael A Gatzoulis; Sonya V Babu-Narayan; Wei Li Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 5.501