Literature DB >> 33100617

Flexible or rigid ring in mitral annuloplasty-do the results differ?

Varghese Thomas Panicker1, Renjith Sreekantan1, Sai Suraj Kotera1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mitral valve annuloplasty has evolved over the decades since its introduction and Carpentier played a major role in developing the technique. Mitral valve repair is preferred over replacement for severe primary mitral regurgitation, as it restores normal life expectancy when successful and does not require lifelong anticoagulation. There is an ongoing debate regarding the choice of ring for mitral valve annuloplasty-rigid or flexible. At present, the choice of ring is based on the availability of the ring and left to the surgeon's discretion.
METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary referral centre. AIM: To compare the outcomes of mitral valve repair annuloplasty with flexible and rigid rings. The hospital records of 112 patients who underwent mitral valve annuloplasty between January 2010 and December 2014 at our hospital were studied. All patients were followed up for 5 years. The rigid and flexible groups were compared for left ventricular (LV) size regression and the presence of mitral regurgitation (MR).
RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients had no progression of mitral regurgitation at 5-year follow-up, compared with the immediate postoperative period. The choice of the ring (rigid and flexible) did not affect the recurrence of mitral regurgitation. At 5-year follow-up, three patients (2 patients in the rigid group and 1 patient in the flexible group) had 3+ MR. One of the two patients in the rigid group had poor functional status and underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR). The other two patients (one in the rigid group and one in the flexible group) with 3+ MR had class II NYHA symptoms and were on medical follow-up. The left ventricular internal diameter diastolic (LVIDD) measured 59.1 mm in the flexible ring group and 56.76 mm in the rigid group preoperatively and these values reduced to 48.4 mm and 47.3 mm, at 5-year follow-up respectively. The mean left ventricular internal diameter systolic (LVIDS) size regression at 5 years was 4.5 ± 6.09 mm in the flexible ring group and 3.2 ± 7.17 mm in the rigid ring group and the difference is not statistically significant (p value 0.314). The mean LVIDD size regression at 5 years was 10.62 ± 6.57 mm in the flexible ring group and 9.38 ± 9.29 mm in the rigid ring group and the difference is not statistically significant (p value 0.408).
CONCLUSION: The choice of rigid or flexible ring did not have a marked difference on the outcome of mitral valve annuloplasty at midterm follow-up. © Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Annuloplasty; Flexible; Mitral valve; Repair; Rigid

Year:  2020        PMID: 33100617      PMCID: PMC7572929          DOI: 10.1007/s12055-020-01019-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0970-9134


  18 in total

1.  The choice of mitral annuloplastic ring-beyond "surgeon's preference".

Authors:  Song Wan; Alex P W Lee; Chun-Na Jin; Randolph H L Wong; Herman H M Chan; Calvin S H Ng; Innes Y P Wan; Malcolm J Underwood
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-05

Review 2.  Mitral valve repair: better than replacement.

Authors:  J M Ferrão de Oliveira; Manuel J Antunes
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Luigi P Badano; Victor Mor-Avi; Jonathan Afilalo; Anderson Armstrong; Laura Ernande; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Steven A Goldstein; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Patrizio Lancellotti; Denisa Muraru; Michael H Picard; Ernst R Rietzschel; Lawrence Rudski; Kirk T Spencer; Wendy Tsang; Jens-Uwe Voigt
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  A new reconstructive operation for correction of mitral and tricuspid insufficiency.

Authors:  A Carpentier; A Deloche; J Dauptain; R Soyer; P Blondeau; A Piwnica; C Dubost; D C McGoon
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  [Reconstructive valvuloplasty. A new technique of mitral valvuloplasty].

Authors:  A Carpentier
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1969-02-08       Impact factor: 1.228

6.  Mitral valve annuloplasty: a quantitative clinical and mechanical comparison of different annuloplasty devices.

Authors:  Manuel K Rausch; Wolfgang Bothe; John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Julia C Swanson; D Craig Miller; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  The "physio-ring": an advanced concept in mitral valve annuloplasty.

Authors:  A F Carpentier; A Lessana; J Y Relland; E Belli; S Mihaileanu; A J Berrebi; E Palsky; D F Loulmet
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Long-term clinical results of mitral valvuloplasty using flexible and rigid rings: a prospective and randomized study.

Authors:  Byung-Chul Chang; Young-Nam Youn; Jong-Won Ha; Sang-Hyun Lim; You-Sun Hong; Namsik Chung
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  The Carpentier-Edwards Classic and Physio mitral annuloplasty rings: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Ghada M M Shahin; Geert J M G van der Heijden; Michiel L Bots; Maarten-Jan Cramer; Wybren Jaarsma; José C A Gadellaa; Aart Brutel de la Rivière; Henry A van Swieten
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.676

10.  Mid-term results of mitral valve repair using flexible bands versus complete rings in patients with degenerative mitral valve disease: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Alexandr V Bogachev-Prokophiev; Alexandr V Afanasyev; Sergei I Zheleznev; Vladimir M Nazarov; Ravil M Sharifulin; Alexandr M Karaskov
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.