BACKGROUND: Mechanical unloading during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support may lead to cardiac recovery. Predictors of recovery, however, have not been identified. We aimed to evaluate the time course and durability of echocardiographic, electrocardiographic (ECG), histologic, and neurohormonal changes that occur with LVAD support and to screen for non-invasive markers of cardiac recovery. METHODS: LVAD patients underwent monthly testing, including echocardiographic, ECG, and serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurement. Paired myocardial tissue samples from implant and explant were also analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-six LVAD patients were prospectively followed for an average of 101 +/- 99 days. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) significantly improved at 30 days compared with pre-LVAD (19% +/- 6.6% vs 33% +/- 8.1%, 7.1 +/- 1.2 cm vs 4.9 +/- 1.0 cm, respectively; both p < 0.001), with no improvement thereafter. At 30 days, QRS duration and QTc interval were significantly decreased from pre-LVAD (both p < 0.05). There was a marked reduction in BNP, myocyte size, and collagen deposition with LVAD support (all p < 0.01). In screening for markers of recovery, the decrease in QTc was inversely related to LVEDD at 60 days. Changes in QRS and myocyte diameter also correlated with the improvement in LVEF at 30 days. No patients had sufficient recovery for device explantation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate echocardiographic, ECG, histologic, and neurohormonal improvement during LVAD support. Cardiac recovery peaked by 60 days, and there was a trend toward progressive improvement in QRS duration with ongoing support. We report the association of ECG changes with echocardiographic and histologic improvements. Future prospective studies may yield important markers of recovery.
BACKGROUND: Mechanical unloading during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support may lead to cardiac recovery. Predictors of recovery, however, have not been identified. We aimed to evaluate the time course and durability of echocardiographic, electrocardiographic (ECG), histologic, and neurohormonal changes that occur with LVAD support and to screen for non-invasive markers of cardiac recovery. METHODS:LVADpatients underwent monthly testing, including echocardiographic, ECG, and serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurement. Paired myocardial tissue samples from implant and explant were also analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-six LVADpatients were prospectively followed for an average of 101 +/- 99 days. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) significantly improved at 30 days compared with pre-LVAD (19% +/- 6.6% vs 33% +/- 8.1%, 7.1 +/- 1.2 cm vs 4.9 +/- 1.0 cm, respectively; both p < 0.001), with no improvement thereafter. At 30 days, QRS duration and QTc interval were significantly decreased from pre-LVAD (both p < 0.05). There was a marked reduction in BNP, myocyte size, and collagen deposition with LVAD support (all p < 0.01). In screening for markers of recovery, the decrease in QTc was inversely related to LVEDD at 60 days. Changes in QRS and myocyte diameter also correlated with the improvement in LVEF at 30 days. No patients had sufficient recovery for device explantation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate echocardiographic, ECG, histologic, and neurohormonal improvement during LVAD support. Cardiac recovery peaked by 60 days, and there was a trend toward progressive improvement in QRS duration with ongoing support. We report the association of ECG changes with echocardiographic and histologic improvements. Future prospective studies may yield important markers of recovery.
Authors: Konstantinos G Malliaras; John V Terrovitis; Stavros G Drakos; John N Nanas Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Sara C Martinez; Elisa A Bradley; Eric L Novak; Ravi Rasalingam; Ari M Cedars; Gregory A Ewald; Scott C Silvestry; Susan M Joseph Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2014-06-01
Authors: Mosi K Bennett; Wendy E Sweet; Sara Baicker-McKee; Elizabeth Looney; Kristen Karohl; Maria Mountis; W H Wilson Tang; Randall C Starling; Christine S Moravec Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Deepak K Gupta; Hicham Skali; Jose Rivero; Patricia Campbell; Leslie Griffin; Colleen Smith; Courtney Foster; Brian Claggett; Robert J Glynn; Gregory Couper; Michael M Givertz; Mandeep R Mehra; Marcelo Di Carli; Scott D Solomon; Marc A Pfeffer Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Zaid I Almarzooq; Anubodh S Varshney; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Manan Pareek; Garrick C Stewart; Jerry D Estep; Mandeep R Mehra Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-09-18
Authors: Michael Ibrahim; Abeer Al Masri; Manoraj Navaratnarajah; Urszula Siedlecka; Gopal K Soppa; Alexey Moshkov; Sara Abou Al-Saud; Julia Gorelik; Magdi H Yacoub; Cesare M N Terracciano Journal: FASEB J Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 5.191