Literature DB >> 16397816

Force sharing between two grafts in the anatomical two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Tatsuo Mae1, Konsei Shino, Norinao Matsumoto, Ken Nakata, Norimasa Nakamura, Takehiko Iwahashi.   

Abstract

The normal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be generally divided into two main bundles, anteromedial bundle (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB), and each bundle shared its function in response to external loads including anterior tibial drawer force. While we developed the anatomically oriented ACL reconstruction technique via two femoral tunnels and two parallel tibial tunnels (the "anatomical" two-bundle ACL reconstruction), there were few biomechanical studies about this technique. The purpose of this study was to investigate the force sharing between two separate grafts (anteromedial graft, AMG; posterolateral graft, PLG) in this anatomical two-bundle technique by measuring the force of each bundle in response to anterior tibial load. The anatomical two-bundle technique was performed on 11 patients via two tunnels at the supero-posterior portion of the AMB footprint and the supero-posterior portion of the PLB footprint on the posterior margin of the lateral femoral condyle and two tunnels created in the center of the AMB and the PLB tibial footprints. After two doubled semitendinosus grafts were fixed with two EndoButton-CLs on the femur, they were temporarily fixed to the tension-adjustable force gauge on the tibial cortex. After each bundle of the graft was settled at the tension of 25 N at 20 degrees, the force exerted on the two bundles was measured with the force gauge during applied anterior tibial force of 134 N at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion. While the AMG carried 42.3+/-5.7% of and the PLG shared 57.7+/-5.7% of the total force at 0 degrees, the former took 64.1+/-11.1% and the latter was assigned 33.9+/-11.1% at 90 degrees. This study has demonstrated that the force distribution between the two grafts in the anatomical two-bundle technique was similar to that between the two bundles in the normal ACL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16397816     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-005-0014-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  19 in total

1.  Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endoButton femoral fixation: A prospective study.

Authors:  M Hamada; K Shino; S Horibe; T Mitsuoka; T Miyama; Y Shiozaki; T Mae
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons.

Authors:  N Adachi; M Ochi; Y Uchio; J Iwasa; M Kuriwaka; Y Ito
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-05

3.  Second-look arthroscopy of anterior cruciate ligament grafts with multistranded hamstring tendons.

Authors:  Yukiyoshi Toritsuka; Konsei Shino; Shuji Horibe; Tomoki Mitsuoka; Masayuki Hamada; Ken Nakata; Norimasa Nakamura; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  The anterior cruciate ligament. A functional analysis based on postmortem studies.

Authors:  W Furman; J L Marshall; F G Girgis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Biomechanics of a double prosthetic ligament in the anterior cruciate deficient knee.

Authors:  W J Radford; A A Amis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-11

6.  Arthroscopy-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon substitution. Two- to four-year follow-up results.

Authors:  B R Bach; G T Jones; F A Sweet; C A Hager
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  S P Arnoczky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with multistranded autogenous semitendinosus tendon.

Authors:  A Maeda; K Shino; S Horibe; K Nakata; G Buccafusca
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee using a doubled tendon graft.

Authors:  B Zaricznyj
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction utilizing autogeneous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons: 5-year clinical results.

Authors:  Maurilio Marcacci; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Iacono; Alberto Vascellari; Ivano Loreti; Elisaveta Kon; Mirco Lo Presti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  14 in total

1.  The effect of graft tensioning in anatomic 2-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee joint kinematics.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kouki Nagamune; Koji Nishimoto; Masayoshi Yagi; Kiyonori Mizuno; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Arthroscopic evaluation of ACL grafts reconstructed with the anatomical two-bundle technique using hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  Hidenori Otsubo; Konsei Shino; Norimasa Nakamura; Ken Nakata; Shigeto Nakagawa; Maki Koyanagi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction: a literature review.

Authors:  Charles Crawford; John Nyland; Sarah Landes; Richard Jackson; Haw Chong Chang; Akbar Nawab; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparable results between lateralized single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Eiichi Tsuda; Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Akira Fukuda; Harehiko Tsukada; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Clinical relevance of static and dynamic tests after anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Simone Bignozzi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Nicola Lopomo; Freddie H Fu; James J Irrgang; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: a technical note.

Authors:  Nicolas Pujol; Olivier Fong; Matthieu Karoubi; Philippe Beaufils; Philippe Boisrenoult
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The arrangement and the attachment areas of three ACL bundles.

Authors:  Hidenori Otsubo; Konsei Shino; Daisuke Suzuki; Tomoaki Kamiya; Tomoyuki Suzuki; Kota Watanabe; Mineko Fujimiya; Takehiko Iwahashi; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: is there any difference in stability and function at 3-year followup?

Authors:  Alberto Gobbi; Vivek Mahajan; Georgios Karnatzikos; Norimasa Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Relationship between thickness of the anteromedial bundle and thickness of the posterolateral bundle in the normal ACL.

Authors:  Michihiro Katouda; Takashi Soejima; Tomonoshin Kanazawa; Kousuke Tabuchi; Kouichi Yamaki; Kensei Nagata
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement in 169 patients between single-bundle and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Kawaguchi; Eiji Kondo; Nobuto Kitamura; Shuken Kai; Masayuki Inoue; Kazunori Yasuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.